On Sunday 01 May 2011 22:23:46 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> PS: No smiley, in order to not challenge José's claims...
No need to :-) on a related note I miss your posts for your unique and touchy
(in the sense of touché) sense of humour. ;-)
--
José Abílio
On Saturday 30 April 2011 13:41:55 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> mails emoticons per mail
>
> pavel 3196jose0.68
Believe it, or not, I tried to restrain me from sending more emoticons in the
messages I sent. :-D
SCNR. :-)
(sorry could not resist)
--
José Abílio
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 02:41:55PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> hi all,
>
> some stats for 2.0 development.
> (you will need mail client with fixed chars & proper tabs handling).
>
> * commit activity:
>
> Trunk 2.0: ...
>
> ...
> [...]
> ... 38 ...
&g
On 04/30/2011 11:18 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> figures for the time span later.
>> Can you do figures for loc touched as well instead of number of commits?
> i dont know what you mean. p
>
He means: lines of code. Who was responsible for how many? Number of
commits is les
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> figures for the time span later.
>
> Can you do figures for loc touched as well instead of number of commits?
i dont know what you mean. p
On 30/04/2011 14:41, Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi all,
some stats for 2.0 development.
(you will need mail client with fixed chars& proper tabs handling).
* commit activity:
Trunk 2.0: Branch 1.6:
rgheck 1552spitz 752
sanda 1202uwestoe 692
uwestoe 1050vfr 297
vfr
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > emoticons per mail
> >
> > jose0.68
>
> That's less than I perceived.
>
> Jürgen
:D You're right!
:)
venom00 (subtly climbs the emoticons pyramid)
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> emoticons per mail
>
> jose0.68
That's less than I perceived.
Jürgen
hi all,
some stats for 2.0 development.
(you will need mail client with fixed chars & proper tabs handling).
* commit activity:
Trunk 2.0: Branch 1.6:
rgheck 1552spitz 752
sanda 1202uwestoe 692
uwestoe 1050vfr 297
vfr 922 sanda 255
spitz 791 fo
