> "Karl" == Karl Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Karl> I think your compiler is incorrect on issuing thos warnings.
Karl> Virtual is only required in the case where the derived class
Karl> adds additional work such that distroying the base class won't
Karl> handle destruction of the derivv
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Karl Nelson wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > While compiling LyX in fussy mode of compaq cxx (std strict_ansi -w0),
> > > the following warnings got printed:
> >
> > > | cxx: Info: ../sigc++/basic_signal.h, line 139: destructor for base
> > > | class "Si
On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Karl Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > While compiling LyX in fussy mode of compaq cxx (std strict_ansi -w0),
> > the following warnings got printed:
>
> > | cxx: Info: ../sigc++/basic_signal.h, line 139: destructor for base
> > | class "SigC::Signal_" is not
>
> Hello,
>
> While compiling LyX in fussy mode of compaq cxx (std strict_ansi -w0),
> the following warnings got printed:
> | cxx: Info: ../sigc++/basic_signal.h, line 139: destructor for base
> | class "SigC::Signal_" is not virtual (D:basclsnondto)
> | detected during in
Hello,
While compiling LyX in fussy mode of compaq cxx (std strict_ansi -w0),
the following warnings got printed:
| cxx: Info: ../sigc++/basic_signal.h, line 139: destructor for base
| class "SigC::Signal_" is not virtual (D:basclsnondto)
| detected during instantiation of c
