On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 09:46:48AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Lars> This patch speeds up the scroll-down test by and odd second or
> Lars> two for me. Do others see the same? I guess it cannot do any
> Lars> harm, so com
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Definitely. But does your answer mean you are not opposed to it?
Lars> Not as opposed as I used to be :-)
This is what I had in mind :)
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> If we go the macro way (and we should be very careful about
| Lars> this), then we should go even a bit further.
|
| Lars> We should then use a macro that adds the BOOST_C
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> If we go the macro way (and we should be very careful about
Lars> this), then we should go even a bit further.
Lars> We should then use a macro that adds the BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION,
Lars> and __FILE__ and __LINE__ always to the
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > This patch speeds up the scroll-down test by and odd second or two for
| > me.
|
| Really?
A _very_ coarse test really. I might be mistaken. Howver it cannot
hurt.
| Wow! Did John Torjo's logging li
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> This patch speeds up the scroll-down test by and odd second or
| Lars> two for me. Do others see the same? I guess it cannot do any
| Lars> harm, so committing.
|
| Isn't
Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch speeds up the scroll-down test by and odd second or two for
> me.
Really? Wow! Did John Torjo's logging library ever make it into Boost? IIRC,
using it would be equivalent to your change here.
> void BufferView::Pimpl::update(Update::f
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> This patch speeds up the scroll-down test by and odd second or
Lars> two for me. Do others see the same? I guess it cannot do any
Lars> harm, so committing.
Isn't it possible to do this in a more compact way? If we use macros,
This patch speeds up the scroll-down test by and odd second or two for
me. Do others see the same? I guess it cannot do any harm, so
committing.
Index: src/BufferView_pimpl.C
===
--- src/BufferView_pimpl.C (revision 14332)
+++
