Re: Signal (interrupt) handling by lyx_main.C

2002-11-20 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Rob Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Just wondering if this is going to be a welcome improvement. Yes I belive so, but we might want to tweak the interface a bit, both to be more OS independant and more C++ friendly. (boost::function, boost::signals) I have not had time to really look at it

Re: Signal (interrupt) handling by lyx_main.C

2002-11-20 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:41:35PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote: > I've been writing a general signal handler for my own project and was > wondering whether that (in a modified form) could be used for LyX. This would be probably useful, but at the least we'd want to use boost::signal for the handler c

Signal (interrupt) handling by lyx_main.C

2002-11-19 Thread Rob Lahaye
Hi, I had a look at the signal handling stuff in src/lyx_main.C and I think that part is not fancy enough when compared to the overall fancy performance of LyX :). I've been writing a general signal handler for my own project and was wondering whether that (in a modified form) could be used for