Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> What would this 'intermediate' format be?
>
> Andre> Basically .lyx but with some 'could be either a layout or
> some Andre> ERT' bits.
>
> Another solution would be to precompile layout files into a
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What would this 'intermediate' format be?
Andre> Basically .lyx but with some 'could be either a layout or some
Andre> ERT' bits.
Another solution would be to precompile layout files into a
dumbed-down version for tex2lyx, but I am n
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:26:31PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> I wonder whether we should go back and make tex2lyx completely
> Andre> ignorant of .layout files again and rather produce some
> Andre> 'intermediate' form
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> I wonder whether we should go back and make tex2lyx completely
Andre> ignorant of .layout files again and rather produce some
Andre> 'intermediate' format and shift the layout handling part into
Andre> LyX proper.
What would this '
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 09:47:31AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >> Given the steady stream of people asking about tex2lyx, would it
> >> make sense to set up separate cvs trees for both tex2lyx and
> >> lyx2lyx? They are separate executables after all...
> >
> > Note that m
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> Given the steady stream of people asking about tex2lyx, would it
>> make sense to set up separate cvs trees for both tex2lyx and
>> lyx2lyx? They are separate executables after all...
>
> Note that my original plan was to have them separated and then two
> guys came along p
