Am Freitag, 4. Dezember 2015 um 11:54:37, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-12-04, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am 3. Dezember 2015 um 22:08:35, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >> On 2015-12-02, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >> > Am 2. Dezember 2015 um 22:07:36, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >> >
>
> Dear Kornel,
>
>
>
On 2015-12-04, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am 3. Dezember 2015 um 22:08:35, schrieb Guenter Milde
>> On 2015-12-02, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> > Am 2. Dezember 2015 um 22:07:36, schrieb Guenter Milde
Dear Kornel,
>> Generally, labels are sensible to select subsets that cannot easily be
>> selected via r
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 02:06:57AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2015 um 22:08:35, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
> > >> >> Do we want a label for all tests with low signal/noise ratio?
> >
> > >> > I want.
> >
> > >> >> How to name this label?
> >
> > >> Suggestions: fragil
Am Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2015 um 22:08:35, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-12-02, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am 2. Dezember 2015 um 22:07:36, schrieb Guenter Milde
>
> Dear Kornel,
>
> ...
>
> >> It would make it easier to work with the labels, if we write the
> >> complete "hierarchy" into su
On 2015-12-02, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am 2. Dezember 2015 um 22:07:36, schrieb Guenter Milde
Dear Kornel,
...
>> It would make it easier to work with the labels, if we write the
>> complete "hierarchy" into sublabels.
> Let my last commit settle a little. I try to implement, but only step
> by
Am Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2015 um 22:07:36, schrieb Guenter Milde
> Dear Kornel,
>
> thank you for the fast reply.
:)
> On 2015-12-02, Kornel Benko wrote:
...
> When I issue
> >> #> ctest --print-label,
> I get a long list of all existing labels in the ctest-autotests.
>
> It would make it e
Dear Kornel,
thank you for the fast reply.
On 2015-12-02, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am, 2. Dezember 2015 um 12:20:14, schrieb Guenter Milde
>> On 2015-12-01, Kornel Benko wrote:
...
>> When tagging tests that fail,
>> we want tags for
>> a) the reason of failure (TexBug, LyxBug, incompatibility,
Am Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2015 um 12:20:14, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-12-01, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am 30. November 2015 um 12:56:22, schrieb Guenter Milde
> >> On 2015-11-28, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> Thanks for explaining the filter chain. The table in Development.lyx gives
> a quite goo
On 2015-12-01, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am 30. November 2015 um 12:56:22, schrieb Guenter Milde
>> On 2015-11-28, Kornel Benko wrote:
Thanks for explaining the filter chain. The table in Development.lyx gives
a quite good overview. I still believe there is room for improvement in
both, the actual t
Am Montag, 30. November 2015 um 12:56:22, schrieb Guenter Milde
> On 2015-11-28, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
...
> Why do you use a filter chain?
Because some filter are more general than others.
First filter is the most general.
> Wouldn't it be easier to maintain separate filters?
>
> Currently
On 2015-11-28, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Originally, this file should have regexes to select export combinations
> which fail. Therefore the name 'reverted'.
Unfortunately, this name is confusing: we revert a commit but invert a test.
> Soon we (Scott and I) found, that some tests worked on Scott's
Originally, this file should have regexes to select export combinations which
fail.
Therefore the name 'reverted'.
Soon we (Scott and I) found, that some tests worked on Scott's side, but not on
mine (or reverse).
Now, this file includes many tests which are not at all reverted. The main
purpo
12 matches
Mail list logo
