Am Donnerstag, dem 17.08.2023 um 20:51 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes:
> +1
Thanks, done.
--
Jürgen
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
+1
JMarc
Le 17 août 2023 16:12:43 GMT+02:00, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>I don't think there is a value in keeping LyX compilable with Qt < 5.2,
>because 5.2 was released 10 years ago.
>Even closed/commerical LTS variants of current distros do not show support
>>10y.
>
>So +1 for removal from my s
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 02:40:44PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> But this would mean, in consequence, that if we implement something
> within the 2.4 cycle, we would have to make sure it still compiles with
> Qt < 5.2.
>
> I got to this while pondering about the URL link warning dialog.
> Imp
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 02:40:44PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 17.08.2023 um 07:24 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > I'm not necessarily against it, but the argument for keeping that
> > code is that it might be helpful to do a bisect of Qt to figure out a
> > Qt bug. The
Am Donnerstag, dem 17.08.2023 um 07:24 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> I'm not necessarily against it, but the argument for keeping that
> code is that it might be helpful to do a bisect of Qt to figure out a
> Qt bug. The reason we require a higher Qt 5.x is that *some* things
> don't work well,
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 10:18:13AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 17.08.2023 um 10:01 +0200 schrieb Jürgen
> Spitzmüller:
> > According to the README, we require Qt 5.2 or higher for 2.4.
> >
> > There is still some code for Qt < 5.2 in the source. Particularly a
> > self-ba
Am Donnerstag, dem 17.08.2023 um 10:01 +0200 schrieb Jürgen
Spitzmüller:
> According to the README, we require Qt 5.2 or higher for 2.4.
>
> There is still some code for Qt < 5.2 in the source. Particularly a
> self-baked "Don't ask me again" warning dialog.
>
> OK to remove that (see patch)?
I
According to the README, we require Qt 5.2 or higher for 2.4.
There is still some code for Qt < 5.2 in the source. Particularly a
self-baked "Don't ask me again" warning dialog.
OK to remove that (see patch)?
--
Jürgen
diff --git a/src/frontends/qt/FancyLineEdit.cpp b/src/frontends/qt/FancyLine
