Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 15 March 2001 16:48, Dekel Tsur wrote:
| > On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 07:32:18AM +0100, Cyrille Artho wrote:
| > > Hi Dekel,
| > > you have a point there. However, the visual feedback of the numbers
| > > *and* the sliders is much stronger, so
On Thursday 15 March 2001 16:48, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 07:32:18AM +0100, Cyrille Artho wrote:
> > Hi Dekel,
> > you have a point there. However, the visual feedback of the numbers
> > *and* the sliders is much stronger, so it is harder to overlook the
> > given selection. Fin
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 07:32:18AM +0100, Cyrille Artho wrote:
> Hi Dekel,
> you have a point there. However, the visual feedback of the numbers
> *and* the sliders is much stronger, so it is harder to overlook the
> given selection. Finally, when the table appears, one usually can easily
> tell h
On 14-Mar-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On the other hand, other dialogs are stateless (for example the print
> dialog) and inconsistency is bad.
IMO the print dialog should also remember my last selections (didn't it
do this in the past?) as it is most probably that if I change f.ex. the
printernam
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 11:06:22AM +0100, Cyrille Artho wrote:
> the reference pop-up should *not* remember the previous selection of the
> reference category, at least not of that was a PageRef. I found my
> document cluttered with PageRef's instead of normal refs just because
> that dialog would
Hi,
the reference pop-up should *not* remember the previous selection of the
reference category, at least not of that was a PageRef. I found my
document cluttered with PageRef's instead of normal refs just because
that dialog would not reset itself. The way popups normally work is that
you always
