On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:36:59PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Additionally, xforms is choosing an *awful* font :
>
> Font 'Roman, Medium, Italic, Normal, Language: English' matched by
> -adobe-times-medium-i-normal--24-240-75-75-p-125-iso8859-1
>
> Disabling the "rescale bitmap fonts" option fix
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Additionally, xforms is choosing an *awful* font :
John> Font 'Roman, Medium, Italic, Normal, Language: English' matched
John> by -adobe-times-medium-i-normal--24-240-75-75-p-125-iso8859-1
John> Disabling the "rescale bitmap fonts" opt
That worked great. Thanks,
Garst
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Attached is a diff of my reverted preferences dialog. This should apply (you
> should apply it directly from within the /forms directory). As I wrote in
> another mail, this gives the pref dialog (xforms 1.0) a sensible size again.
>
Garst R. Reese wrote:
> That gives me a 2.5Mb patch instead of a 40Kb patch. Anyway, we should
> see if it works. I really do not think it is wise to create patches
> using xforms CVS unless they are tested against all acceptable versions
> of xforms. I am using 1.0.
Attached is a diff of my rever
Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>>
>> Garst R. Reese wrote:
>> > Sorry Rob, but your patch no longer applies (reverses) cleanly.
>> > Lots of failures and fuzz.
>>
>> cvs diff -u -r1.59 -r1.60 > rob.diff
>> patch -R -p0 < rob.diff
>>
>> seems to work here (building yet)
>> J
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > Sorry Rob, but your patch no longer applies (reverses) cleanly. Lots of
> > failures and fuzz.
>
> cvs diff -u -r1.59 -r1.60 > rob.diff
> patch -R -p0 < rob.diff
>
> seems to work here (building yet)
> Juergen.
That gives me a 2.5Mb patch
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Yes, possibly me. Problem is, I don't see this "knackered" things with
> my Xforms. I'm using Xforms CVS, is that why?
Probably. I have xforms 1.0 from SuSE 8.2 and I have those problems too :-(
> Although my polishing patch was quite cute and a lot of work, how
> about revers
Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Sorry Rob, but your patch no longer applies (reverses) cleanly. Lots of
> failures and fuzz.
cvs diff -u -r1.59 -r1.60 > rob.diff
patch -R -p0 < rob.diff
seems to work here (building yet)
Juergen.
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
>
> Rob Lahaye wrote:
>
> > Although my polishing patch was quite cute and a lot of work, how
> > about reversing it (below is my orifinal patch; can you reverse it
> > and test).
> >
Sorry Rob, but your patch no longer applies (reverses) cleanly. Lots of
failures and fuzz
Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Although my polishing patch was quite cute and a lot of work, how
> about reversing it (below is my orifinal patch; can you reverse it
> and test).
>
> R.
Sure, but it would have been easier if you had not inlined to patch :)
On my slow box it might take awhile anyway.
Thanks,
Garst R. Reese wrote:
> "Garst R. Reese" wrote:
>
>>John Levon wrote:
>>
>>>I'm seeing andre's prefs dialog problems. It's completely knackered.
>>>
>>
>>"knackered" is too kind.
>>
>>Garst
>
> Checking, I find a lyx version on my box dated May 23 that exhibits
> these problems.
> May 7 is OK. R
"Garst R. Reese" wrote:
>
> John Levon wrote:
> >
> > I'm seeing andre's prefs dialog problems. It's completely knackered.
> >
>
> "knackered" is too kind.
>
> Garst
Checking, I find a lyx version on my box dated May 23 that exhibits
these problems.
May 7 is OK. Rob?
Garst
John Levon wrote:
>
> I'm seeing andre's prefs dialog problems. It's completely knackered.
>
> Additionally, xforms is choosing an *awful* font :
>
> Font 'Roman, Medium, Italic, Normal, Language: English' matched by
> -adobe-times-medium-i-normal--24-240-75-75-p-125-iso8859-1
>
> Disabling the
13 matches
Mail list logo
