Re: xforms 1.0 final released

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> | | Lars> | Lars> Ok, I have created RH 8.

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:30:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> | >> | Lars> Ok, I have created RH 8.0 rpms from this. >

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:30:56PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > | Lars> Ok, I have created RH 8.0 rpms from this. > | > | Lars> If any interest I'll put that on ftp

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> | Lars> | Lars> Ok, I have created RH 8.0 rpms from this. Lars> | Lars> | Lars> If any interest I'l

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Ok, I have created RH 8.0 rpms from this. | | Lars> If any interest I'll put that on ftp. | | Will rh8 rpms work on rh7 also? Since rpms should be independent from | the

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Ok, I have created RH 8.0 rpms from this. Lars> If any interest I'll put that on ftp. Will rh8 rpms work on rh7 also? Since rpms should be independent from the gcc version (no c++), we should distribute only one version of the

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

Ronny Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Am Montag, 9. Dezember 2002 13:13 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: | > Darren Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 21:01, Angus Leeming wrote: | > >> Ok, it's out. | > >> | > >> Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.8

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

Am Montag, 9. Dezember 2002 13:13 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: > Darren Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 21:01, Angus Leeming wrote: > >> Ok, it's out. > >> > >> Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 in LyX 1.3? > | > | I would say that it needs to go, b

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephan> Yesterday I tried to compile 1.0-release on my solaris Stephan> machine. I can't say it compiles out of the box, but the Stephan> problems where solveable. But I didn't try to install the Stephan> shared

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> IMHO we should let 0.88 go now, and wait a short while into the | Lars> freeze period before we make final decision on 0.89. (currently | Lars> I am inclined to keep 0.89 f

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 10 December 2002 11:15 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | | > | Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok,

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> IMHO we should let 0.88 go now, and wait a short while into the Lars> freeze period before we make final decision on 0.89. (currently Lars> I am inclined to keep 0.89 for 1.3.0) Agreed. Is there special code for 0.89 vs 1.0? J

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Tuesday 10 December 2002 11:15 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > | Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok, it's out. > | Lars> | > | Lars> | Are we going to kee

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok, it's out. | Lars> | | Lars> | Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 in LyX | Lars> 1.3? | | Lars> _I_ woul

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:51 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:15 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > > Angus> wrote: > >> But it does the compose key preprocessing first. > > Angus> Not totally true. I

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:15 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Angus> wrote: >> But it does the compose key preprocessing first. Angus> Not totally true. It passes all FL_KEYPRESS events to the Angus> XWorkArea handler. It just so happ

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:15 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > But it does the compose key preprocessing first. Not totally true. It passes all FL_KEYPRESS events to the XWorkArea handler. It just so happens that during composition the passed "key" is null. That's why this can be made to wo

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Tuesday 10 December 2002 9:57 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Angus> wrote: >> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok, it's out. Lars> | Lars> | Are we go

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 11:07:10AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > >So what was the final decision on this? I think we should get rid of > >0.88 now, since it is the most problematic. Note however that this > >will cause problems for people who use solaris and for cjk-lyx, > >because of shortcomings

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Tuesday 10 December 2002 10:07 am, Juergen Vigna wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > So what was the final decision on this? I think we should get rid of > > 0.88 now, since it is the most problematic. Note however that this > > will cause problems for people who use solaris and for cjk-lyx

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Tuesday 10 December 2002 9:57 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok, it's out. > Lars> | > Lars> | Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 in LyX > Lars> 1.3? > > La

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

> "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephan> Yesterday I tried to compile 1.0-release on my solaris Stephan> machine. I can't say it compiles out of the box, but the Stephan> problems where solveable. But I didn't try to install the Stephan> shared libs, because of the susp

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: So what was the final decision on this? I think we should get rid of 0.88 now, since it is the most problematic. Note however that this will cause problems for people who use solaris and for cjk-lyx, because of shortcomings ion xforms support for input methods. But thi

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok, it's out. Lars> | Lars> | Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 in LyX Lars> 1.3? Lars> _I_ would like us to ditch support for 0.88 and

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok, it's out. Lars> | Lars> | Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 in LyX Lars> 1.3? Lars> _I_ would like us to ditch support for 0.88 and 0.89 at once, Lars> especi

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Monday 09 December 2002 7:20 pm, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:20:15AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > How about this as a hacked-together first-stab at an announcement. It > > sort of > > here's the state of the next LDN as it is : > http://compsoc.man.ac.uk/~moz/www-user/news/

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:20:15AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > How about this as a hacked-together first-stab at an announcement. It sort of here's the state of the next LDN as it is : http://compsoc.man.ac.uk/~moz/www-user/news/ I can certainly modify that as needs be john -- "Saying that

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:55:04AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > The most commonly reported xforms bug of the last few months has been crashes > in the xforms xpm image loader due to its fragile handling of weird > ImageMagik-generated xpm color tables. Ditching support for xforms 0.88 would >

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 10:48:06AM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Why not release 1.3.0 and 1.4.0 at the same time, with the caveats that > 1.3.0 will not be supported and 1.4.0 does not support 0.88 and 0.89. > You need not answer if this is too stupid to be believed. This would not really remove

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Monday 09 December 2002 12:38 pm, Kornel Benko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > On Montag, 9. Dezember 2002 12:29, José Matos wrote: > > On Monday 09 December 2002 11:20, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > We are happy to announce the release of the GPL-licensed, version 1.0 > > > of > >

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On 09-Dec-2002 Angus Leeming wrote: > On Monday 09 December 2002 12:12 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:29:19AM +, José Matos wrote: >> > Kayvan has rpms for 1.0RC5.2, the spec file can be used unchanged for >> > 1.0.0. This is gives both binary and source code rpm. Thi

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Monday 09 December 2002 12:12 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:29:19AM +, José Matos wrote: >> > Kayvan has rpms for 1.0RC5.2, the spec file can be used unchanged for >> > 1.0.0. This is gives both binary and source code rp

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Montag, 9. Dezember 2002 12:29, José Matos wrote: > On Monday 09 December 2002 11:20, Angus Leeming wrote: > > We are happy to announce the release of the GPL-licensed, version 1.0 of > > The licence is LGPL IIRC. > > [...] > > > Get the xforms src distro at

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Monday 09 December 2002 12:12, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:29:19AM +, José Matos wrote: > > Kayvan has rpms for 1.0RC5.2, the spec file can be used unchanged for > > 1.0.0. This is gives both binary and source code rpm. This will cover > > all systems based on rpms. >

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Monday 09 December 2002 12:12 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:29:19AM +, José Matos wrote: > > Kayvan has rpms for 1.0RC5.2, the spec file can be used unchanged for > > 1.0.0. This is gives both binary and source code rpm. This will cover > > all systems based on rpms

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:29:19AM +, José Matos wrote: > Kayvan has rpms for 1.0RC5.2, the spec file can be used unchanged for > 1.0.0. This is gives both binary and source code rpm. This will cover > all systems based on rpms. Where do I get this spec file? Andre' -- Those who desire to

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

Darren Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 21:01, Angus Leeming wrote: >> Ok, it's out. >> >> Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 in LyX 1.3? > | I would say that it needs to go, but maybe hold off until binary | distributions of xforms1.0 are available.

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Monday 09 December 2002 11:29 am, José Matos wrote: > The licence is LGPL IIRC. > Kayvan has rpms for 1.0RC5.2, the spec file can be used unchanged for > 1.0.0. This is gives both binary and source code rpm. This will cover all > systems based on rpms. Thanks, José. It starts to read a li

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 21:01, Angus Leeming wrote: > Ok, it's out. > > Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 in LyX 1.3? I would say that it needs to go, but maybe hold off until binary distributions of xforms1.0 are available. I for one never got the source to compile, and would l

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Monday 09 December 2002 11:20, Angus Leeming wrote: > > We are happy to announce the release of the GPL-licensed, version 1.0 of The licence is LGPL IIRC. [...] > Get the xforms src distro at > > ftp://ncmir.ucsd.edu/pub/xforms/OpenSource/xforms-1.0-release.tgz > > Binary distros for L

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Monday 09 December 2002 10:52 am, José Matos wrote: > The idea is to get the word spread before the change. That will get some > time for people to prepare the transition. How about this as a hacked-together first-stab at an announcement. It sort of tails off towards the end, but I'm expectin

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Monday 09 December 2002 10:38, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > It would be nice if we could find some kind of consensus on this one. > > I am using 0.89.6 but I won't mind upgrading to 1.0. > > Installing xforms is not too hard and could be done by the "average power > user". So I am leaning a bit to

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Monday 09 December 2002 10:38 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:28:31AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > | Ok, it's out. > > | > > | Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 in LyX 1.3? > > > > _I_ would like us to ditch support for 0.88 and 0.89 at once, >

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 11:28:31AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Ok, it's out. > | > | Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 in LyX 1.3? > > _I_ would like us to ditch support for 0.88 and 0.89 at once, > especially 0.88. > > But, at least in an interim period, this will

Re: xforms 1.0 final released

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok, it's out. | | Are we going to keep support for xforms 0.88 and 0.89 in LyX 1.3? _I_ would like us to ditch support for 0.88 and 0.89 at once, especially 0.88. But, at least in an interim period, this will mean a lot of hassle for a lot of people.