On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 01:22:25PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:18:16AM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
>
> > >
> > > BTW do I understand correctly that paintRows only actually repaints
> > > one row, the one the cursor is on (rowpainter.C:1087)? What do I miss?
>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 10:18:16AM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> >
> > BTW do I understand correctly that paintRows only actually repaints
> > one row, the one the cursor is on (rowpainter.C:1087)? What do I miss?
>
> No, paintRows paints everything from 'rit' to the end of screen or end
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 11:19:32AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Why do I get the feeling that you wouldn't spend more time just
> rewriting this from scratch, than trying to understand it?
I had this feeling for the first time a couple of years ago. But people
played the burned child as this was
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 09:05:13AM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
>
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:10:51PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:46:28PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> > >
> > > the four
> > > y-related arguments to paintRows() and tell me about his f
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 10:10:51PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:46:28PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> >
> > the four
> > y-related arguments to paintRows() and tell me about his findings.
> >
> > *sigh*
> >
> > Andre'
>
> Suggesting a transformation: replace
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:46:28PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
>
> the four
> y-related arguments to paintRows() and tell me about his findings.
>
> *sigh*
>
> Andre'
Suggesting a transformation: replace the two args y2 and yf by a
single dy. Doesn't help understanding much, but makes th
