Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This may be the kind of situation where we could have a --strict
> option to tex2lyx that uses ERT every time there is a tiny difference,
> the default being to use the translation that makes more sense.
Yes. One could even think of finer granularity (writer2latex ha
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> So there is a visible difference between the two. I am
Georg> therefore not changing tex2lyx and leave \underline in ERT.
This may be the kind of situation where we could have a --strict
option to tex2lyx that uses ERT every time ther
Andreas Vox wrote:
> The code is equivalent to
> \def\underbar#1{\underline{\sbox2{#1}\dp2 0\box2}}
>
> which stores its argument in box #2, sets the box' depth to zero and uses
> this box as an argument to \underline.
>
> This means that \underline puts the bar beneath any text while \underbar
>
> "Andreas" == Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas> This means that \underline puts the bar beneath any text
Andreas> while \underbar puts the bar at the baseline, cutting through
Andreas> ys, gs, qs, ps etc.
Andreas> \underbar looks more useful to me for emphasing text.
Thanks f
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Changing LyX to use \underline instead of \underbar would
> be nice too, but I am not sure it is safe.
Or maybe switch to ulem or soul (which results of course in data change).
Jürgen
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx:
>
> \def\underbar#1{\underline{\sbox\tw@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I do not understand this definition and need therefore help: Should tex2lyx
> recognize \underline as \underbar and print
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> tex2lyx does not convert \underline, see
Georg> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1594. This is correct
Georg> in a strict sense, because LyX uses \underbar, not \underline.
Georg> From /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/latex.ltx:
