On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:52:38PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >Ok, this could be solved by copying/linking the correct one to
> >.lyx/scripts/foo2bar, couldn't it?
>
>
> so I ask again: where is the sense of $$s? The whole converting
> stuff works works as expected and with a LibScriptSearch y
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:33:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>>Andre> See attachment.
>>
>>I do not understand. What do you intend to do with it? Why not make
>>the converter stuff look into scripts/ too when trying to run any
>>program?
>>
>
>>I added a few mo
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:33:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: See attachment.
>> I do not understand. What do you intend to do with it? Why not
>> make the converter stuff look into scripts/ too when trying to run
>
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:33:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> See attachment.
>
> I do not understand. What do you intend to do with it? Why not make
> the converter stuff look into scripts/ too when trying to run any
> program?
> I added a few month ago a command LibScriptSearc
Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 July 2002 4:22 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>>>when developpers have no real new ideas or tired of
>>>bughunting, then they beautify the code ...
>>>
>>And it often is high time for it...
>>
>
> This is:
> * old code that must soon be split into a Controller
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:22:07PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> And it often is high time for it...
In this case it really was not. The code was ok...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:49:24PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> But I'm not going to delve deeply at the moment. Fancy having a go?
Andre> See attachment.
I do not understand. What do you intend to do with it? Why not make
the
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 4:22 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
> > when developpers have no real new ideas or tired of
> > bughunting, then they beautify the code ...
>
> And it often is high time for it...
This is:
* old code that must soon be split into a Controller and a View if GUI-I is
to be finis
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 05:19:14PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> when developpers have no real new ideas or tired of
> bughunting, then they beautify the code ...
The most important aspect of code beautifying is that one can change one's
mind and revert all changes a week later.
And there are obv
David Kastrup wrote:
> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Angus Leeming wrote:
>>
>>
>
? I find this more readable as I do not have to scroll down to learn that
str is no further modified and it might save a copy as well.
>>>Go ahead.
>>>Angus
>>>
>>>
>>
>>when de
Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> >>? I find this more readable as I do not have to scroll down to learn that
> >>str is no further modified and it might save a copy as well.
> >>
> > Go ahead.
> > Angus
> >
>
>
> when developpers have no real new ideas or t
Angus Leeming wrote:
>> string str;
>> if (...) {
>> str = ...
>> } else if (...) {
>> str =...
>> }
>> return str;
>>
>>to
>>
>> if (...)
>> return ...
>> if (...)
>> return ...
>> return string();
>>
>>? I find this more readable as I do not have to scroll down to learn that
>>str is no
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 4:03 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:31:16PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > You should add a note to the user of the preferences dialog:
>
> Ok.
>
> But as I have this file in the editor now: Would anybody mind me changing
> things like
>
> string
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:31:16PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> You should add a note to the user of the preferences dialog:
Ok.
But as I have this file in the editor now: Would anybody mind me changing
things like
string str;
if (...) {
str = ...
} else if (...) {
str =...
}
return
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 3:44 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:49:24PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > But I'm not going to delve deeply at the moment. Fancy having a go?
>
> See attachment.
Oh, very neat.
You should add a note to the user of the preferences dialog:
FormP
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:49:24PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> But I'm not going to delve deeply at the moment. Fancy having a go?
See attachment.
[I don't like the 'extern' stuff, but it is used in othre places too, so I
guess it does not matter much]
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:49:24PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> But I'm not going to delve deeply at the moment. Fancy having a go?
I'll have a look...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 2:00 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:34:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Remember that I suggested adding a $$lyxlib variable, analogous to $$i,
> > $$o that would be expanded to the right thing?
>
> It looks fine.
>
> > Nobody seemed that intere
Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 July 2002 1:28 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>>Should I attach a '.sh' suffix for shell scripts in lib/scripts or not?
>>
>>Angus: Is there a way do specify in the .lyx/preferences' converters
>>section that a converter from /lib/scripts should be
>>used?
>>
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:34:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Remember that I suggested adding a $$lyxlib variable, analogous to $$i, $$o
> that would be expanded to the right thing?
It looks fine.
> Nobody seemed that interested, so
> I didn't persue the matter.
Nobody rejected the propos
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 1:28 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Should I attach a '.sh' suffix for shell scripts in lib/scripts or not?
>
> Angus: Is there a way do specify in the .lyx/preferences' converters
> section that a converter from /lib/scripts should be
> used?
Remember that I suggested add
21 matches
Mail list logo
