Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
>>> H. Any ideas on how best to tackle this?
>>
>> Add another argument for the relative depth, with 0 for lyx and 1 for
>> tex2lyx?
>>
>> NormalizePath(AddPath(binary_dir, "../" * (depth + 1) + "lib"));
>>
>> I am not sure how serious this is
Jose' Matos wrote:
>> H. Any ideas on how best to tackle this?
>
> Add another argument for the relative depth, with 0 for lyx and 1 for
> tex2lyx?
>
> NormalizePath(AddPath(binary_dir, "../" * (depth + 1) + "lib"));
>
> I am not sure how serious this is. ;-)
Not bad actually. Not bad
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> The scheme expects that the binary to be in the
Angus> /src directory, but tex2lyx is in the
Angus> /src/tex2lyx directory. See get_build_dirs:
Angus> string const binary_dir = OnlyPath(binary); string const
Angus> build_suppor
On Thursday 27 January 2005 17:26, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> A.
>
> The scheme expects that the binary to be in the /src
> directory, but tex2lyx is in the /src/tex2lyx directory.
> See get_build_dirs:
>
> string const binary_dir = OnlyPath(binary);
> string const build_support_dir =
>
Jose' Matos wrote:
> $ ./tex2lyx ~/test.tex
> Unable to determine the system directory having searched
> /home/jamatos/lyx/lyx-devel/src/share/lyx-1.4.0cvs/
> Try the '-sysdir' command line parameter or set the environment variable
> LYX_DIR_13x to the LyX system directory containing the fi
