On Thursday 13 June 2002 9:03 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | No doubt the very mention of "--with-included-string" will mark it for
> | immediate annihilation.
>
> Yes!
Well it's gone. If Allan ever needs it agian, then we can always think about
puttin
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| No doubt the very mention of "--with-included-string" will mark it for
| immediate annihilation.
Yes!
--
Lgb
On 12 Jun 2002, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> On Wednesday 12 June 2002 2:51 pm, John Levon wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:49:49PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> >> wrote: > Angus> We don't use it and it's not standards
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Wednesday 12 June 2002 2:51 pm, John Levon wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:49:49PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>> wrote: > Angus> We don't use it and it's not standards compliant
>> anyway. Can I > Angus> nuke it? Angus
>>
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 2:51 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:49:49PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Angus> We don't use it and it's not standards compliant anyway. Can I
> > Angus> nuke it? Angus
> >
> > Yes, I think you should
>
> Last time I tried this I was told it'
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:49:49PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> We don't use it and it's not standards compliant anyway. Can I
> Angus> nuke it? Angus
>
> Yes, I think you should
Last time I tried this I was told it's need for the STLPort or some
such. Is this no longer supported
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> We don't use it and it's not standards compliant anyway. Can I
Angus> nuke it? Angus
Yes, I think you should
JMarc
