On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:34:15PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> Yes. That was what I said needed doing in the later part of my email.
> What is supposed to go wrong? It seems to work as I would expect make
> to work when I remove it -- ie. libqt2.a is rebuilt when the xforms
> stuff changes.
If c
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:20:27AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > Why do we have libqt2_la_DEPENDENCIES?
>
> have you tried removing it ?
Yes. That was what I said needed doing in the later part of my email.
What is supposed to go wrong? It seems to work
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:20:27AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> Why do we have libqt2_la_DEPENDENCIES?
have you tried removing it ?
john
--
"I'd rather be rudely informed than politely left in the dark."
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:08:32PM +0200, Yves Bastide wrote:
> src/frontends/qt2/{,ui/}Makefile.am define twice DISTCLEANFILES, the first
> one seeming unnecessary.
coo, do they ?
> Also, src/frontends/qt2/ui/moc/Makefile.am contains a strange
> #$(patsubst, %, %Dialog_moc.C, $(DIALOGS))
