Re: some C++ queries

2003-02-19 Thread Angus Leeming
Juergen Vigna wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: >> I am starting to believe that all insets should cache a bufferview >> or some "context" after e.g. draw() is called ... > > The problem with this is that the BufferView is sometimes redone and > you point to a non valid pointer (the problems we had e

Re: some C++ queries

2003-02-19 Thread Juergen Vigna
Andre Poenitz wrote: I am starting to believe that all insets should cache a bufferview or some "context" after e.g. draw() is called ... The problem with this is that the BufferView is sometimes redone and you point to a non valid pointer (the problems we had especially in the beginning with In

Re: some C++ queries

2003-02-18 Thread Allan Rae
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 02:44:11PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > I think I have just about cleaned up the controllers code so that it is now > > transparent. As a result of this clean-up I have managed to replace all > > those boost::signals in fronten

Re: some C++ queries

2003-02-18 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: >> The only problem that remains is extracting the cached_bufferview (which >> is a problem common to all these 'solutions'). > > I am starting to believe that all insets should cache a bufferview or some > "context" after e.g. draw() is called ... > >> Am I correct in saying

Re: some C++ queries

2003-02-18 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:15:21PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Not sure. I personally would lean to the first option, as the InsetBase > > ideally does not know anything about dialogs > > > > (which, of course is not true, as it has to declase 'hideDialog'...). > > Not

Re: some C++ queries

2003-02-18 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: > Not sure. I personally would lean to the first option, as the InsetBase > ideally does not know anything about dialogs > > (which, of course is not true, as it has to declase 'hideDialog'...). Not true. hideDialog need not be virtual if we adopt your 'guiding principle', a

Re: some C++ queries

2003-02-18 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 02:44:11PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > I think I have just about cleaned up the controllers code so that it is now > transparent. As a result of this clean-up I have managed to replace all > those boost::signals in frontends/Dialogs.h with normal C++ class methods. Goo