Re: show the lyx code

2010-06-14 Thread Helge Hafting
On 07. juni 2010 13:45, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Well why not instead of displaying the "latex source" display directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be reloaded. Would such a solution be easier to implement? Why would anyone want to edit the LyX source (in LyX) ?

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2010-06-07, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> * Backspace at the first position in the inset converts it to normal >> text (in this case LaTeX code (without beeing marked as ERT)) > not in math inset. Sorry, then this is a feature request. >> OK, I see 2 advantages: >> 1. no nee

Re: show the lyx code

2010-06-07 Thread Richard Heck
On 06/07/2010 09:53 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: If you're such a power-user that you use it so often that this becomes uncomfortable, you probably should start to learn how to use the math inset to do the things you want. frankly i dont use it at all and the m

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > If you're such a power-user that you use it so often that this becomes > uncomfortable, you probably should start to learn how to use the math > inset to do the things you want. frankly i dont use it at all and the main point was about discoverability for normal use

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> * Backspace at the first position in the inset converts it to normal >>   text (in this case LaTeX code (without beeing marked as ERT)) > > not in math inset. > >> OK, I see 2 advantages: >> >> 1. no need to place the cur

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Guenter Milde wrote: > * Backspace at the first position in the inset converts it to normal > text (in this case LaTeX code (without beeing marked as ERT)) not in math inset. > OK, I see 2 advantages: > > 1. no need to place the cursor or highlight thats what i call uncomfortable. pavel

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Guenter Milde
On 2010-06-07, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> > what looks much easier is to allow mutating math environment into ERT >> > and back. >> > >> > pavel >> > >> This is already possible. It needs some copy-pasting but it works. I >> once implemented this, but then disregarded it

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > what looks much easier is to allow mutating math environment into ERT > > and back. > > > > pavel > > > > This is already possible. It needs some copy-pasting but it works. I > once implemented this, but then disregarded it because it was > essentially already pos

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
> what looks much easier is to allow mutating math environment into ERT > and back. > > pavel > This is already possible. It needs some copy-pasting but it works. I once implemented this, but then disregarded it because it was essentially already possible. Vincent

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
> Well why not instead of displaying the "latex source" display > directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be > reloaded. Would such a solution be easier to implement? > Why would anyone want to edit the LyX source (in LyX) ? Vincent

Re: show the lyx code (was: feature proposal: show latex code: allow to manipulate the latex code: reveal code)

2010-06-07 Thread Pavel Sanda
Uwe Brauer wrote: >>> >>> >> This is a long-standing request. You can find it on trac, if you >> look. Unfortunately, it is not at all easy to do. > > Well why not instead of displaying the "latex source" display > directly the LyX source and allow it to be edited and then to be