If you use pain string concatenation you will certainly fail... but
the os.path module might be of help.
I tried. os.path.join two full paths will return the latter. In my
patch today, I discard the drive part of the second path, and do
things like
c:\destdir + c:\program files = c:\destdir\pro
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Bo> BTW, I use scons alone on all platforms now. I find that DESTDIR
| Bo> is still working in a wrong way. It *replaces* prefix
| Bo> (DESTDIR/bin/lyx) rather than prefix it (DESTDIR/prefix/b
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> BTW, I use scons alone on all platforms now. I find that DESTDIR
Bo> is still working in a wrong way. It *replaces* prefix
Bo> (DESTDIR/bin/lyx) rather than prefix it (DESTDIR/prefix/bin/lyx).
Bo> I am going to change it, but how autotools hand
You believe far too much what's written somewhere on the net without
checking it by yourself.
As I have said, I am not proficient enough to judge the critics of
this article. I cite it in case that Georg or you knows what the
author is talking about. Anyway, my own experience with autotools has
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:39:34AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> I had so many more rebuild just because of mysterious time stamp
> change, so I do not really know if your claim is true. Anyway, I doubt
> if make is that good at dependency checking. Quoting from
> http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/1702/
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 05:32:45PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 03:09:59PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >
> >> Vive la France! Or is that Viva l'Italia? Given that most of the French
> >> team is almost as old as I am, I feel a certain empathy
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 03:09:59PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Vive la France! Or is that Viva l'Italia? Given that most of the French
>> team is almost as old as I am, I feel a certain empathy with them. Then
>> again, the Italians played delightfully against the
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 03:09:59PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Vive la France! Or is that Viva l'Italia? Given that most of the French team
> is
> almost as old as I am, I feel a certain empathy with them. Then again, the
> Italians played delightfully against the Germans. I'm having difficulty
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Then, why not letting the user decide?
>
> echo "LyX requires autoconf >= 2.52"
> read -n 1 -p "Do you want to continue? " ans
> echo
> if [ "$ans" = "y" -o "$ans" = "Y" ]; then
> echo "Ok, keep fingers crossed..."
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 01:12:49PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
> > Enrico> What about autogen.sh in LyX assuming that it will work with
> > Enrico> autoconf 2.59 but will not work with 2.59e ?
>
> The difference between this autotools stuff and gcc is that the autoto
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The 2.59[a-e] line can be removed when these cutting-edge distributions
| upgrade to 2.60.
None of the curreing edge dists have 59[a-e] do they? Only stuff that
is in testing. Rawhide like distros.
| Incidentally, is there any reason for the "25x" in "
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
> Enrico> What about autogen.sh in LyX assuming that it will work with
> Enrico> autoconf 2.59 but will not work with 2.59e ?
The difference between this autotools stuff and gcc is that the autotools
stuff is used only by developers. Newer versions of gcc can/will be u
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> What about autogen.sh in LyX assuming that it will work with
Enrico> autoconf 2.59 but will not work with 2.59e ?
Personally, I think we should only discriminate against version that
are known to break. But it is just me :)
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 12:26:59PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jose'> On Thursday 06 July 2006 11:07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> As I said, we tweak local boost files to support new systems. So,
> >> assuming that your sys
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> On Thursday 06 July 2006 11:07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> As I said, we tweak local boost files to support new systems. So,
>> assuming that your system version of boost is adapted to your
>> system (which should be the case), no
On Thursday 06 July 2006 11:07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> As I said, we tweak local boost files to support new systems. So,
> assuming that your system version of boost is adapted to your system
> (which should be the case), no change should be needed.
My version always complains in 1.4.x sa
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> My understanding was that boost is close to system include files
Bo> and will not be touched often. After all, if we tweak local boost
Bo> files, what if users use system boost headers?
As I said, we tweak local boost files to support new syst
Am Mittwoch, 5. Juli 2006 21:03 schrieb Bo Peng:
> OK. Here is the deal. I have changed the logic of scons so that boost
> headers will be excluded from the dependency tree only when
> boost=system. That is to say, developers can choose to install system
> boost libraries and enjoy faster start (1
You are right that boost is not touched very often, but I don't want to
think about that, I want the build system to do that for me. Adding 20
seconds to every build is far better than spending two hours to debug a
non-existing bug!
OK. Here is the deal. I have changed the logic of scons so that
Bo Peng wrote:
>> I am not sure if autotools can detect
>> such changes and do a rebuild automatically.
>>
>> It can.
>
> How? I only see boost directory is included, no other special
> treatment. Do you mean make tracks boost dependency in each local .dep
> folder, does it check time stamps of /
I am not sure if autotools can detect
such changes and do a rebuild automatically.
It can.
How? I only see boost directory is included, no other special
treatment. Do you mean make tracks boost dependency in each local .dep
folder, does it check time stamps of /usr/include?
autotools do that
Bo Peng wrote:
> On 7/5/06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> What happens when a file from local boost is changed? This happens
>> from time to time (small tweaks to allow newer gcc or odd system).
>
> Scons will not know that so a manual full rebuild is required (remove
> bui
On 7/5/06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What happens when a file from local boost is changed? This happens
from time to time (small tweaks to allow newer gcc or odd system).
Scons will not know that so a manual full rebuild is required (remove
build directory and rebuild). I
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> 1. Stop building dependency tree of boost libraries when using
Bo> local boost. This reduces the null build time of lyx from 29s to
Bo> 16s. A significant improvement. (I did not know scons spends so
Bo> much time on boost header files).
What
24 matches
Mail list logo
