Re: rae branch patch

2000-03-30 Thread Allan Rae
On 30 Mar 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | I've been wanting to do this for a while however every time I try either > | the nameserver is offline or baywatch is unplugged or I see ssh1 running > | instead of ssh2 (and so wonder if we are still in a s

Re: rae branch patch

2000-03-30 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I've been wanting to do this for a while however every time I try either | the nameserver is offline or baywatch is unplugged or I see ssh1 running | instead of ssh2 (and so wonder if we are still in a security breach | situation) You still see this?

Re: rae branch patch

2000-03-29 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Angus Leeming wrote: > It also contains changes needed to remove the old form_print from the > sources I didn't want that code removed until I/we had compared the two implementations to ensure that any bug fixes etc had be included in the backported work. However, this is o

Re: rae branch patch

2000-03-29 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Angus Leeming wrote: > It also contains changes needed to remove the old > form_print from the sources. This code will use the NEW > print dialog. > > This dialog does not yet work properly. > 1. The file name is appended to an incorrect path. > 2. There are some unaligned e