Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 08/02/2011 02:10, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> >> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > should i try another letter or you are stuck at t? :)
>
> If I was stuck at 't' I would have have committed it :)
> >>>
> >>> so i see those are free : g,h,r,j
>
Il 14/02/2011 21:15, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
anyway going to kill the regexp shortcut soon.
sure, if you need it for more widely useful things.
That means I'm going to convert "\Cr" sequences to
"\Axregexp-mode" ones, in the related test-cases.
Not an issue.
T.
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
>
> The number of items can easily grow, ranging from single-character
> patterns, to multipliers, to combinations of them, you can involve
and for each one new icon, heh :) maybe others will support you,
but my feeling is that while is good that we tech users new TeX
comm
Il 14/02/2011 20:23, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
perhaps an "Insert Regexp..." combo-box again, but placed
in the Advanced pane, which also switches you back to the
Basic pane when you use it (is it soo ugly ?).
i didnt come to anything better.
but, don't discard the toolbar too quickly:
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Il 14/02/2011 01:10, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
>>
>> trying to find out somi ui element inside search dialog,
>> 1) which wouldn't take space of search/replace fields
>> 2) is addressable via keyboard
>
> perhaps an "Insert Regexp..." combo-box again, but placed
> in the Ad
Il 14/02/2011 01:10, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
trying to find out somi ui element inside search dialog,
1) which wouldn't take space of search/replace fields
2) is addressable via keyboard
perhaps an "Insert Regexp..." combo-box again, but placed
in the Advanced pane, which also switches you bac
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> I share the point that the user may hardly notice the extra-menu available
> only while editing in these particular WAs. I was also thinking of creating
> a new toolbar showing up automatically while in these WAs (similarly to
> what happens with Math mode), with these (a
Il 13/02/2011 23:47, Pavel Sanda ha scritto:
errm, ctrl+shift+r was bound highly esoteric regexp-mode.
i dont think this deserves new shortcut. moreover, i cant find this accessible
anywhere in dialog itself. i suppose this means there will be 1% of people ever
getting that regexps are possible
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 08/02/2011 02:10, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> >> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > should i try another letter or you are stuck at t? :)
>
> If I was stuck at 't' I would have have committed it :)
> >>>
> >>> so i see those are free : g,h,r,j
>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 08/02/2011 02:10, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> should i try another letter or you are stuck at t? :)
If I was stuck at 't' I would have have committed it :)
>>>
>>> so i see those are free : g,h,r,j
>>
>> JMarc, do you have some prefer
Le 08/02/2011 02:10, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Pavel Sanda wrote:
should i try another letter or you are stuck at t? :)
If I was stuck at 't' I would have have committed it :)
so i see those are free : g,h,r,j
JMarc, do you have some preference then?
Not really. r for pReview? We do not even
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > should i try another letter or you are stuck at t? :)
> >
> > If I was stuck at 't' I would have have committed it :)
>
> so i see those are free : g,h,r,j
JMarc, do you have some preference then?
pavel
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 28 janv. 2011 ? 10:16, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>
> > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>> people who are happy with single output format can use new default feature
> >>> with ctrl+p, people who need more still can stay with old shortcuts and
> >>> add
> >>> one more..
Le 28 janv. 2011 à 10:16, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> people who are happy with single output format can use new default feature
>>> with ctrl+p, people who need more still can stay with old shortcuts and add
>>> one more...
>>
>> I forgot to mention that I do not like
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> The question is if your workflow is common enough to judge a default
> shortcut.
> After all, people who need multiple output formats frequently can also set up
> a shortcut quickly.
of course, started this thread with "personally". how much is it common
with others
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> people who are happy with single output format can use new default feature
> with ctrl+p, people who need more still can stay with old shortcuts and add
> one more...
The question is if your workflow is common enough to judge a default shortcut.
After all, people who need mul
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > people who are happy with single output format can use new default feature
> > with ctrl+p, people who need more still can stay with old shortcuts and add
> > one more...
>
> I forgot to mention that I do not like the idea of using ctrl-p for view. I
> think
> this
> people who are happy with single output format can use new default feature
> with ctrl+p, people who need more still can stay with old shortcuts and add
> one more...
I forgot to mention that I do not like the idea of using ctrl-p for view. I
think
this is going to be misleading for many people
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > personally i would let the current ctrl+d/t ctrl+t for dvi/postscript
> > and add ctrl+p for default (while killing the printing shortcut,
> > which is imho good hint that printing is good to do with viewer and
> > not directly from lyx. there are even plans to kill
Le 27 janv. 2011 à 13:53, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> What shortcut can be use for this task? Personally, I use
>> Ctrl-T/Shift-Ctrl-T (because TeXShop uses this as ``Typeset''). It
>> hijacks the view postscript shortcut, but this one does not strike me as
>> major.
>>
>>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What shortcut can be use for this task? Personally, I use
> Ctrl-T/Shift-Ctrl-T (because TeXShop uses this as ``Typeset''). It
> hijacks the view postscript shortcut, but this one does not strike me as
> major.
>
> Ideas?
personally i would let the current ctrl+d/t ct
Le 27/01/2011 12:53, lasgout...@lyx.org a écrit :
Author: lasgouttes Date: Thu Jan 27 12:53:51 2011 New Revision:
37338 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37338
Log: For the default View and Update actions of the View menu, use
the lfuns without parameters.
This paves the way for having a s
22 matches
Mail list logo
