VC+Compare feature (was: Re: r31736 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . frontends/qt4)

2009-10-25 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> if you are still in design phase please make it possible to call it >> somewhat parametrically. >> it would make us killer app if we are able to connect compare with version >> control one day. >> >> i dream about something like Compare with current version - x co

Re: r31736 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . frontends/qt4

2009-10-25 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Pavel Sanda schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Pavel Sanda schreef: v...@lyx.org wrote: void GuiCompare::finished(bool aborted) { enableControls(true); + if (old_buffer_) + old_buffer_->setReadonly(false); + if (new_buffer_) +

Re: r31736 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . frontends/qt4

2009-10-25 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Pavel Sanda schreef: >> v...@lyx.org wrote: >> >>> void GuiCompare::finished(bool aborted) >>> { >>> enableControls(true); >>> + if (old_buffer_) >>> + old_buffer_->setReadonly(false); >>> + if (new_buffer_) >>> + new_buffer_->setRead

Re: r31736 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . frontends/qt4

2009-10-25 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Pavel Sanda schreef: v...@lyx.org wrote: void GuiCompare::finished(bool aborted) { enableControls(true); + if (old_buffer_) + old_buffer_->setReadonly(false); + if (new_buffer_) + new_buffer_->setReadonly(false); does this touches the o

Re: r31736 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . frontends/qt4

2009-10-25 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Pavel Sanda schreef: v...@lyx.org wrote: void GuiCompare::finished(bool aborted) { enableControls(true); + if (old_buffer_) + old_buffer_->setReadonly(false); + if (new_buffer_) + new_buffer_->setReadonly(false); does this touches the o

Re: r31736 - in lyx-devel/trunk/src: . frontends/qt4

2009-10-25 Thread Pavel Sanda
v...@lyx.org wrote: > void GuiCompare::finished(bool aborted) > { > enableControls(true); > + if (old_buffer_) > + old_buffer_->setReadonly(false); > + if (new_buffer_) > + new_buffer_->setReadonly(false); does this touches the opened buffer in view? if yes,