Re: r30766 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-07-29 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 01:34:45PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > I was still able to find cases where it would fail. Looking more closely at > > the code, it was clear that a similar treatment should have also been > > performed in TeXEnvironment(). After careful

Re: r30766 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-07-29 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > I was still able to find cases where it would fail. Looking more closely at > the code, it was clear that a similar treatment should have also been > performed in TeXEnvironment(). After careful testing, I have committed a > fix to trunk that doesn't fail for all the cont

Re: r30766 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-07-28 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 08:09:06AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > J�rgen, this is also needed in branch. The attached document shows a case > > with both a redundant switch and a missing one. > > OK. Makes sense. I was still able to find cases where it would fail

Re: r30766 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-07-24 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > Jürgen, this is also needed in branch. The attached document shows a case > with both a redundant switch and a missing one. OK. Makes sense. Jürgen

Re: r30766 - lyx-devel/trunk/src

2009-07-24 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 12:50:32AM +0200, for...@lyx.org wrote: > Author: forenr > Date: Sat Jul 25 00:50:32 2009 > New Revision: 30766 > URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/30766 > > Log: > Smash another case of missing language switch and also avoid redundant > switches. > Essentially, non-