rgheck schreef:
On 07/17/2009 02:11 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
An error message you do not want to get (from some highly
sophisticated piece of software) :
Whoops. If the attached looks OK, please commit.
By the way, did you do this as a check, or ar
On 07/17/2009 02:11 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
An error message you do not want to get (from some highly
sophisticated piece of software) :
Whoops. If the attached looks OK, please commit.
By the way, did you do this as a check, or are you actually mi
Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef:
An error message you do not want to get (from some highly
sophisticated piece of software) :
Vincent
<>
An error message you do not want to get (from some highly sophisticated
piece of software) :
Vincent
On 07/17/2009 02:25 AM, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 7:10 AM, rgheck wrote:
On 07/16/2009 06:24 PM, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Fri Jul 17 00:24:39 2009
New Revision: 30636
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/30636
Minor nitpick: s/co
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 7:10 AM, rgheck wrote:
> On 07/16/2009 06:24 PM, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
>>
>> Author: rgheck
>> Date: Fri Jul 17 00:24:39 2009
>> New Revision: 30636
>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/30636
Minor nitpick: s/coudl/could/
1509 _("LyX
rgheck wrote:
> > Log:
> > Fix bug #6076. As said there, other configuration files probably need to
> > be checked.
> >
> >
>
> For branch?
Yes, please.
Jürgen
On 07/16/2009 06:24 PM, rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: rgheck
Date: Fri Jul 17 00:24:39 2009
New Revision: 30636
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/30636
Log:
Fix bug #6076. As said there, other configuration files probably need to be
checked.
For branch?
rh
