Am Montag, 5. März 2007 19:09 schrieb Georg Baum:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > writes:
> >
> > | I don't know of such a path validity check, but maybe I overlooked
it.
> > | Are you aware of such a function?
> >
> >
> > I only know of these (in boost):
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> fs::exists should never throw if it does we are feeding it really
> bogus data already. So IMHO the try/catch should not be needed.
> That is why I really would like to know _what_ throws really.
One reason was that the length of the string was exceeding MAX_PATH o
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
>
> | I don't know of such a path validity check, but maybe I overlooked it.
> | Are you aware of such a function?
>
>
> I only know of these (in boost):
>
> http://www.boost.org/libs/filesystem/doc/protability_guide.htm#nam
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I don't know of such a path validity check, but maybe I overlooked it. Are
| you aware of such a function?
I only know of these (in boost):
http://www.boost.org/libs/filesystem/doc/protability_guide.htm#name_check
--
Lgb
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > writes:
| >
| > | Do you have a better idea? The regexes will never be perfect, so we must
| > | be able to test whether a given string denotes an existing file.
| >
| > fs::exists shou
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
>
> | Do you have a better idea? The regexes will never be perfect, so we must
> | be able to test whether a given string denotes an existing file.
>
> fs::exists should never throw if it does we are feeding it really
> bo
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Do you have a better idea? The regexes will never be perfect, so we must be
| able to test whether a given string denotes an existing file.
fs::exists should never throw if it does we are feeding it really
bogus data already. So IMHO the try/catch sho
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
| > And I am really annoyed at you keeping discussions _only_ in bugzilla.
| > Impossible for others to follow development then.
| >
| Wrong! If you watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] in bugzilla, you will
| receive all changes to all bu
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 15:38 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> This really feels wrong.
>
> Suddenly it is tripple the complexity.
Do you have a better idea? The regexes will never be perfect, so we must be
able to test whether a given string denotes an existing file.
> And I am really annoyed
Lars Gullik Bjønnes schrieb:
And I am really annoyed at you keeping discussions _only_ in bugzilla.
Impossible for others to follow development then.
Wrong! If you watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] in bugzilla, you will
receive all changes to all bug reports (because John is our QA man).
Michael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Author: baum
| Date: Sun Mar 4 14:22:38 2007
| New Revision: 17405
|
| URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17405
| Log:
| Fix bug 3305
| * src/LaTeX.C
| (insertIfExists): Catch boost::filesystem exceptions, since they
| are not errors in this cont
11 matches
Mail list logo
