On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 10:35:07PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Asger Ottar Alstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > | > | this I do use BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION (and even got flamed for doing
> so
> | > | > | by Asger).
> |
> | We profiled stuff and found that in some critical inner loo
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Then you are saying that __func__ is hurting a lot... and that is
resolved at compile time, so I just do not belive you.
This depends on the compiler.
What costs is writing to lyxerr in the first place, not
BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION. A lyxerr null-wirte is not free. (f
Asger Ottar Alstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | > | this I do use BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION (and even got flamed for doing so
| > | > | by Asger).
|
| We profiled stuff and found that in some critical inner loops, the use
| of BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION hurt performance a lot. If you want to use
|
| > | this I do use BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION (and even got flamed for doing so
| > | by Asger).
We profiled stuff and found that in some critical inner loops, the use
of BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION hurt performance a lot. If you want to use
such stuff, please make sure it is guarded correctly to not
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > writes:
| >
| > | this I do use BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION (and even got flamed for doing so
| > | by Asger).
| >
| > Hmm. Why was that?
|
| I believe he thought that BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTIO
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
>
> | this I do use BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION (and even got flamed for doing so
> | by Asger).
>
> Hmm. Why was that?
I believe he thought that BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION would pull in too much
other stuff and is too expensive, but
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| this I do use BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION (and even got flamed for doing so by
| Asger).
Hmm. Why was that?
--
Lgb
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> It is not really about making me happy you know...
Yes I know. I should have added a smiley:-) I know why
BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION is better. I did just not think about it yesterday,
since this was only moving code around. When I add new debug messages like
this I do us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Author: baum
| Date: Thu Feb 22 09:18:59 2007
| New Revision: 17298
|
| URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17298
| Log:
| make Lars happy
It is not really about making me happy you know...
--
Lgb
