Am Mittwoch, 8. November 2006 19:18 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 02:41:15PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> > Yes, that was the reason for similar problems in the past, but I could
not
> > find any undefined virtual method. Are we all blind? BTW Abdel your
latest
> > patch does not
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 02:41:15PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Yes, that was the reason for similar problems in the past, but I could not
> find any undefined virtual method. Are we all blind? BTW Abdel your latest
> patch does not help either (although callinf the Painter() constructor is a
> good
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 02:19:02PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> - : qwa_(qwa)
> -{
> - //lyxerr << "QLPainter::start()" << endl;
> - QPainter::begin(qwa_);
> +QLPainter::QLPainter(QPaintDevice * device)
> + : QPainter(device), Painter()
> +{
The empty Painter() contructor woul
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:49:54PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Abdelrazak> POD?
>
> Plain old data (bool, int, double... as opposed to structs and classes).
also structs that are valid 'plain C structs'.
Andre'
Georg Baum wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
If changing the inheritance order then I prefer this last solution.
That does not help (and if it did it would be vodoo to me), but I found the
problem: You have to reimplement _all_ virtual methods in the derived
class, not just the undefined ones.
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> If changing the inheritance order then I prefer this last solution.
Georg> That does not help (and if it did it would be vodoo to me), but
Georg> I found the problem: You have to reimplement _all_ virtual
G
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> If changing the inheritance order then I prefer this last solution.
That does not help (and if it did it would be vodoo to me), but I found the
problem: You have to reimplement _all_ virtual methods in the derived
class, not just the undefined ones. I am not sure whethe
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
Peter Kümmel wrote:
"I don't know if this will help you, but I got this one time when I
declared a virtual member but failed to define it."
Yes, that was the reason for similar problems in the past, but I could not
find any undefined virtual method. Are w
Georg Baum wrote:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
>> "I don't know if this will help you, but I got this one time when I
>> declared a virtual member but failed to define it."
>
> Yes, that was the reason for similar problems in the past, but I could not
> find any undefined virtual method. Are we all bl
Georg Baum wrote:
> Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
>> "I don't know if this will help you, but I got this one time when I
>> declared a virtual member but failed to define it."
>
> Yes, that was the reason for similar problems in the past, but I could not
> find any undefined virtual method. Are we all bl
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Not in this case. I tried to instantiate a QLPainter with new and it
> works fine. I am 100% sure that MSVC does not compile with incomplete
> virtual interface.
You could not instantiate a class with a missing virtual implementation,
I've tested it.
Peter
Georg Baum wrote:
Peter Kümmel wrote:
"I don't know if this will help you, but I got this one time when I
declared a virtual member but failed to define it."
Yes, that was the reason for similar problems in the past, but I could not
find any undefined virtual method. Are we all blind?
I am
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> "I don't know if this will help you, but I got this one time when I
> declared a virtual member but failed to define it."
Yes, that was the reason for similar problems in the past, but I could not
find any undefined virtual method. Are we all blind? BTW Abdel your latest
pat
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Yes this would be strange.
Peter> Here the next idea:
No luck either... Would have bee strange too :)
JMarc
Gogling gives mw this:
"I don't know if this will help you, but I got th
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Peter> Yes this would be strange.
>
> Peter> Here the next idea:
>
> No luck either... Would have bee strange too :)
>
> JMarc
>
>
Gogling gives mw this:
"I don't know if this will help you, but I got
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
I don't use pch here (gcc too old), but it does not work. I just tried
Peter's fix, and it did not help either (as expected, if gcc had a problem
with inlined virtual destructors many people would have seen it).
Yes this would be strange.
Here the next i
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Yes this would be strange.
Peter> Here the next idea:
No luck either... Would have bee strange too :)
JMarc
Georg Baum wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak> Really? hum, do you use precompiled header?
Yes. I'll try to remove them and recompile.
I don't use pch here (gcc too old), but it does not work. I just tried
Peter's fix, and it did not help either (as expected, if gcc had a problem
Georg Baum wrote:
> I don't use pch here (gcc too old), but it does not work. I just tried
> Peter's fix, and it did not help either (as expected, if gcc had a problem
> with inlined virtual destructors many people would have seen it).
Yes this would be strange.
Here the next idea:
Index: QLPai
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Abdelrazak> Really? hum, do you use precompiled header?
>
> Yes. I'll try to remove them and recompile.
I don't use pch here (gcc too old), but it does not work. I just tried
Peter's fix, and it did not help either (as expected, if gcc had a problem
with inlined vir
Peter Kümmel wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Maybe this helps.
If it solves the problem and I fear it will, it is a gcc bug.
Abdel.
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> BTW, I still cannot link after your latest commit. Same errors as
>> Georg.
Abdelrazak> Does this patch helps?
No :(
JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Abdelrazak> Yes, the destructor was not virtual. This
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Also, the 'const' of isDrawing Enabled seems badly placed.
Returning a 'bool const' is weird,
Abdelrazak> I thought this was defined in LyX code style as a hint to
Abdelrazak> say "This returned value is n
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Yes, the destructor was not virtual. This should be fixed
Abdelrazak> now.
Also, the 'c
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdel
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Yes, the destructor was not virtual. This should be fixed
Abdelrazak> now.
Also, the 'c
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Abdelrazak> Yes, the destructor was not virtual. This should be fixed
Abdelrazak> now.
>> Also, the 'const' of isDra
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Yes, the destructor was not virtual. This should be fixed
Abdelrazak> now.
Also, the 'const' of isDrawing Enabled seems badly placed. Returning a
'bool const' is weird,
I thought this was de
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Yes, the destructor was not virtual. This should be fixed
Abdelrazak> now.
Also, the 'const' of isDrawing Enabled seems badly placed. Returning a
'bool const' is weird, but OTOH the method could be const.
JMarc
Georg Baum wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: younes
Date: Mon Oct 30 11:47:59 2006
New Revision: 15615
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/15615
Log:
Forgot that!
That was not enough. It does not link:
frontends/qt4/.libs/libqt4.a(QLPainter.o
(.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN3lyx8frontend7Pain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: younes
> Date: Mon Oct 30 11:47:59 2006
> New Revision: 15615
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/15615
> Log:
> Forgot that!
That was not enough. It does not link:
frontends/qt4/.libs/libqt4.a(QLPainter.o
(.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN3lyx8frontend7PainterC2Ev+
32 matches
Mail list logo
