Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| IMO (now as you address this) it would be a nice idea to start LyX with
| an empty document (automatic New) open. Then if we don't do anything and
| only Open another Document we just can close this before and then open
| the new one. What do you think?
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Angus Leeming wrote:
> class LyXView {
> public:
> LyXFunc * getLyXFunc() { return lyxfunc; }
> BufferView * view() { return bufferview; }
> private:
> LyXFunc * lyxfunc;
> BufferView * bufferview;
> }
>
> both lyxfunc and bufferview are set in LyXVie
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 31-Mar-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> > So when I delete the last loaded document/buffer lyx should just
> > create an empty one?
> >
>
> IMO (now as you address this) it would be a nice idea to start LyX with
> an empty document (automa
On 31-Mar-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> So when I delete the last loaded document/buffer lyx should just
> create an empty one?
>
IMO (now as you address this) it would be a nice idea to start LyX with
an empty document (automatic New) open. Then if we don't do anything and
only Open ano
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| QUESTION 1. Would it not make more sense if the public
| methods returned references? This is probably true of most
| of the methods in LyXFunc that currently return pointers to
| data.
What then to return if you have no BufferViews (of we could just
p
