On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:36:39PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 11:26:39AM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> > Michael Gerz wrote:
> >
> > >Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > >
> > >>I don't know... 34 minutes and counting.
> > >
> >
> > Martin,
> >
> > did you succeed finally?
>
>
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 11:26:39AM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Michael Gerz wrote:
>
> >Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> >>I don't know... 34 minutes and counting.
> >
>
> Martin,
>
> did you succeed finally?
Oh yes, of course. Jeez what is that Motif look ugly ;-(
- Martin
pgp2DZIe3RqK0.pgp
De
Michael Gerz wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
I don't know... 34 minutes and counting.
Martin,
did you succeed finally?
Michael
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 06:50:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 06:14:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 04:42:31PM +0200, Lar
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 06:14:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 04:42:31PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > |
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 06:14:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 04:42:31PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 04:04:31PM +0200, Mic
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 04:42:31PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 04:04:31PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
| > | > Martin Vermeer wrote:
| > | >
| > | > >I don't know...
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 04:42:31PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 04:04:31PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> | > Martin Vermeer wrote:
> | >
> | > >I don't know... 34 minutes and counting.
> | > >
> | > >I may well have mi
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 04:04:31PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
| > Martin Vermeer wrote:
| >
| > >I don't know... 34 minutes and counting.
| > >
| > >I may well have mixed up qt4 and qt3... I have both installed. Shouldn't
| > >that be legal? I installe
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 04:26:55PM +0200, Andre Pönitz wrote:
> Zitat von Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>>Only... the uic compiler for qt4 seems to take an eternity to process
> >>>even a single .ui file. It's slaving away for eleven minutes (and
> >>counting)
> >>>on BiblioUi.ui! And Bib
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 04:04:31PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> >I don't know... 34 minutes and counting.
> >
> >I may well have mixed up qt4 and qt3... I have both installed. Shouldn't
> >that be legal? I installed using yum and got no complaints.
> >
> >
> Yes, it is p
Zitat von Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Only... the uic compiler for qt4 seems to take an eternity to process
>even a single .ui file. It's slaving away for eleven minutes (and counting)
>on BiblioUi.ui! And BiblioUi.[Ch] havn't even been created yet.
>
>It _is_ running, at 40% CPU use. Me
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Martin Vermeer wrote:
|
| >I don't know... 34 minutes and counting.
| >
| >I may well have mixed up qt4 and qt3... I have both installed. Shouldn't
| >that be legal? I installed using yum and got no complaints.
| >
| Yes, it is perfectly legal. I have qt
Am Samstag, 21. Oktober 2006 15:58 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 03:44:20PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> > What are your figures?
>
> I don't know... 34 minutes and counting.
That is definitely too long. In fact, anything longer than a few seconds is
wrong.
> I may well have
Martin Vermeer wrote:
I don't know... 34 minutes and counting.
I may well have mixed up qt4 and qt3... I have both installed. Shouldn't
that be legal? I installed using yum and got no complaints.
Yes, it is perfectly legal. I have qt3 and qt4 on the same machine, too.
Could you please inst
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 03:44:20PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> >No... clean \n's. The file isn't big either, just 139 lines. It's
> >version 4.0. They all are.
> >
> >What gets run is the script /usr/bin/uic-qt4. Is that for you too?
> >
> >- Martin
> >
> >
> I tested
Martin Vermeer wrote:
No... clean \n's. The file isn't big either, just 139 lines. It's
version 4.0. They all are.
What gets run is the script /usr/bin/uic-qt4. Is that for you too?
- Martin
I tested the following (on my really old machine):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> time qt-4.1.4/bin/uic Bib
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 03:07:56PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> >Trying to come on board again... installed qt4-4.1.4 and -devel for FC4,
> >did the autogen, configure and make thing, and seems to be building OK.
> >
> >
> Welcome back! I installed qt 4.1.4 on my old SuS
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Trying to come on board again... installed qt4-4.1.4 and -devel for FC4,
did the autogen, configure and make thing, and seems to be building OK.
Welcome back! I installed qt 4.1.4 on my old SuSE Linux 9.3 machine and
it worked out of the box.
Only... the uic compiler
19 matches
Mail list logo
