Re: qt document dialog

2002-10-08 Thread Edwin Leuven
> You do now. > You have now access to all of frontends. Thanks, I'll check it in then... > the qt dir is pretty much open development, but focus should not be on > streamlining, but on getting all the basic funcitonality in. I think we all agree on that... Regards, Ed.

Re: qt document dialog

2002-10-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Is it in a working state? > | As I said most of it is sort of ok-ish > | bullets don't work | buffer isn't updated yet > >> Should it then be committed at once? >> (why not?) > | why not indeed, it allows others to tinker with it too, could you or someo

Re: qt document dialog

2002-10-08 Thread Edwin Leuven
> Is it in a working state? As I said most of it is sort of ok-ish bullets don't work buffer isn't updated yet > Should it then be committed at once? > (why not?) why not indeed, it allows others to tinker with it too, could you or someone else see to it? I don't know whether I still have cvs

Re: qt document dialog

2002-10-08 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:44:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Should it then be committed at once? > (why not?) I agree, if the source is clean, commit it. We can then work on the remaining bits, I may even find time to help out with some of it. That's what I did for the math dialog an

Re: qt document dialog

2002-10-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | No it's not finished yet but for those wanting to know where it's heading a | patch... Is it in a working state? Should it then be committed at once? (why not?) -- Lgb

Re: qt document dialog

2002-08-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Edwin" == Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It is passed as an option to \usepackage{graphicx} (and >> \usepackage{color}?). Edwin> got it! Edwin> does it make sense to have this as a *document* setting? it Edwin> seems to me that this is more a latex installation issue? This

Re: qt document dialog

2002-08-22 Thread Edwin Leuven
> It is passed as an option to \usepackage{graphicx} (and > \usepackage{color}?). got it! does it make sense to have this as a *document* setting? it seems to me that this is more a latex installation issue? Ed.

Re: qt document dialog

2002-08-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Edwin" == Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> This is a guess but isn't the psdriver a parameter for some of the >> latex document classes? IIRC foils uses a psdriver option to >> determine how it attempts PS specials for its logo placement. Edwin> I did toggle it and exported to

Re: qt document dialog

2002-08-22 Thread Edwin Leuven
> This is a guess but isn't the psdriver a parameter for some of the > latex document classes? IIRC foils uses a psdriver option to > determine how it attempts PS specials for its logo placement. I did toggle it and exported to latex, but it didn't appear. If it's an option for some classes on

Re: qt document dialog

2002-08-22 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Edwin Leuven wrote: > > For the ps driver, I don't really know when it is useful... > > I'll drop it from the document dialog This is a guess but isn't the psdriver a parameter for some of the latex document classes? IIRC foils uses a psdriver option to determine how it att

Re: qt document dialog

2002-08-22 Thread Edwin Leuven
> For the ps driver, I don't really know when it is useful... I'll drop it from the document dialog In addition I will move the preamble to the document dialog where it belongs Ed.

Re: qt document dialog

2002-08-21 Thread Edwin Leuven
disregard this message. I must be delirious: for a moment I confused lyx with latex... it's far too late sorry about the noise, Ed On Wednesday 21 August 2002 10:30 pm, you wrote: > > At least float placement is a document setting (think about sending a > > doc to someone else and have all the

Re: qt document dialog

2002-08-21 Thread Edwin Leuven
> At least float placement is a document setting (think about sending a > doc to someone else and have all the floats appear at a different > place) this won't happen. the setting is only relevant on float creation. it doesn't therefore get exported to latex either. this is why i thought to have

Re: qt document dialog

2002-08-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Edwin" == Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Edwin> I wonder whether we want these as per document settings? Edwin> Wouldn't it be more logical to have these only in the global Edwin> preferences? At least float placement is a document setting (think about sending a doc to someone

Re: qt document dialog

2002-08-21 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 21 August 2002 3:53 pm, Edwin Leuven wrote: > and these two: > > * float placement > > * ps driver > > I wonder whether we want these as per document settings? Wouldn't it be > more logical to have these only in the global preferences? I can imagine setting a per-document float

Re: qt document dialog

2002-08-21 Thread Edwin Leuven
My new organization can be seen below. sides, columns, extra options will be grouped together since they are class options packages are together the following options are a bit different from the rest since these don't make it into the latex file: > * quote style I have kept this with lang

Re: qt document dialog

2002-08-21 Thread Edwin Leuven
Please have a look guys, I don't want to redo everything after you see the patch. This is quite a complicate dialog. Ed. On Tue Aug 20, 2002 20:10, Edwin Leuven wrote: > back from a short vacation I picked up again qt's new document dialog and > am doing a bit of rearranging both to make things