On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, John Weiss wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 11:55:48PM -0500, John Weiss wrote:
>
> Yup, "prosper.layout" is really a modified version of my old
> "slides.layout". It should be commented as such.
>
> P.S.: Please change all references to my email address from
> "[EMAIL PROT
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 11:55:48PM -0500, John Weiss wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 01:51:14PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> >
> > Quoting myself: "... Weiss's layout seems to work best at the moment."
> >
> > That probably refers to this layout:
> > http://www.md.kth.se/~chr/lyx/e
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:57:30AM +, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 October 2003 08:55, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > There is a prosper.layout from Dekel. Is there a specific reason we do
> > not distribute this?
>
> And also another from John Weiss.
> Christian some more bits about thi
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 01:51:14PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> Quoting myself: "... Weiss's layout seems to work best at the moment."
>
> That probably refers to this layout:
> http://www.md.kth.se/~chr/lyx/examples/prosper/layouts/prosper-by-Weiss.layout
>
Aroo? I don't rec
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > Uh.. I get "syntax error" on the sentence above, but I don't think I've
>
> How many should we tell you to upgrade your compiler? ;-)
This one is internal unfortunately :-)
> Would it be too difficult to put there just a link?
> Please. :-)
I m
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 12:47, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> >
> > And also another from John Weiss.
> > Christian some more bits about this soomewhere in the wiki.
>
> Uh.. I get "syntax error" on the sentence above, but I don't think I've
How many should we tell you to upgrade your c
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > There is a prosper.layout from Dekel. Is there a specific reason we
> > do not distribute this?
>
> There is also one from John Weiss. I don't think anyone's taken the
> time to ascertain why one and not the other, although I u
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 October 2003 08:55, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > There is a prosper.layout from Dekel. Is there a specific reason we do
> > not distribute this?
>
> And also another from John Weiss.
> Christian some more bits about this soomewhere in the
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> There is a prosper.layout from Dekel. Is there a specific reason we
> do not distribute this?
There is also one from John Weiss. I don't think anyone's taken the
time to ascertain why one and not the other, although I understand
that Christian has used both in anger.
--
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 08:55, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> There is a prosper.layout from Dekel. Is there a specific reason we do
> not distribute this?
And also another from John Weiss.
Christian some more bits about this soomewhere in the wiki.
I also intend to polish it and put it in the
10 matches
Mail list logo
