Re: preview status update.

2002-07-05 Thread Kuba Ober
On czwartek 04 lipiec 2002 02:43 pm, Angus Leeming wrote: > I believe that I have finished the preview stuff, bar some minor tidy-ups. > Attached is a screen shot for you. It's now quick (doesn't block LyX when > the buffer is loaded) and the user code has a nice, neat interface. Should > please A

Re: preview status update.

2002-07-05 Thread David Kastrup
"Michael A. Koziarski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Man, that Screen shot is cool! The research mathematician here is > drooling. If he be drooling over the difference of the already quite readable LyX rendition to the preview, you might imagine the drool preview-latex users have shed over the

Re: preview status update.

2002-07-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "David" == David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David> [switched back to list, since this has become on-topic again, David> hope you won't mind] No problem David> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> No, they are drawn 'by hand' with lines, I believe. However, >> some

Re: preview status update.

2002-07-05 Thread David Kastrup
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 11:09:31AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > How about that: set up a poll page where users can actively select all > > options they think worth having as default, or where they don't mind. > > If somebody does want to have someth

Re: preview status update.

2002-07-05 Thread David Kastrup
[switched back to list, since this has become on-topic again, hope you won't mind] Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, they are drawn 'by hand' with lines, I believe. However, someone > decided that the right delimiter should be inferred from the left > one using a rotation ma

Re: preview status update.

2002-07-05 Thread David Kastrup
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 10:36:13AM +0100, Jules Bean wrote: > > > I'll define an LColor::preview and you can do as you like. > > > > LColor::mathpreview? > > No. > > > If LColor::math wants to be different from LColor::foreground, then > > LColor::m