On 9/18/20 1:32 PM, José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> On Friday, September 18, 2020 4:59:47 PM WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>
> > The version of postats.py in master has been updated to work with
>
> > (indeed, require) Python 3. Is there any reason not to backport it?
>
> >
>
> > Riki
>
>
> No. :-
On Friday, September 18, 2020 4:59:47 PM WEST Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> The version of postats.py in master has been updated to work with
> (indeed, require) Python 3. Is there any reason not to backport it?
>
> Riki
No. :-)
In this case this is a development tool, and those traditionally c
Am Freitag, den 18.09.2020, 11:59 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
> The version of postats.py in master has been updated to work with
> (indeed, require) Python 3. Is there any reason not to backport it?
Since you're the one who needs to use it (and the only real user) I
think this is complet
The version of postats.py in master has been updated to work with
(indeed, require) Python 3. Is there any reason not to backport it?
Riki
On 9/18/20 11:32 AM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> ../lyx-stable/po/ [⚡ 2.3.x] > /usr/bin/python3 ./postats.py "2.3.5.2"
> ar.po bg.po cs.po de.po el.po en
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
I have also been thinking a bit about the update mechanism. Do we want
www-user to automatically update everytime someone commits, or would we
prefer a manually invoked update? (It could for instance be that a
developer clicks
Christian Ridderström wrote:
I have also been thinking a bit about the update mechanism. Do we want
www-user to automatically update everytime someone commits, or would we
prefer a manually invoked update? (It could for instance be that a
developer clicks on a button 'Update www
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
I have also been thinking a bit about the update mechanism. Do we want
www-user to automatically update everytime someone commits, or would we
prefer a manually invoked update? (It could for instance be that a
developer clicks on
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > I have also been thinking a bit about the update mechanism. Do we want
> > www-user to automatically update everytime someone commits, or would we
> > prefer a manually invoked update? (It could for instance be that a
> > developer clicks on a button 'Update www-user' on one
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
BTW Christian, could you eventually update the changes of i18n.inc that
I've committed to www-user some days ago?
How much work is it to re-establish the automatic update? For i18n.inc, we
have discussed the possibility of setting up a non-symbolic link t
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I have also been thinking a bit about the update mechanism. Do we want
> www-user to automatically update everytime someone commits, or would we
> prefer a manually invoked update? (It could for instance be that a
> developer clicks on a button 'Update www-user' on
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > BTW Christian, could you eventually update the changes of i18n.inc that
> > I've committed to www-user some days ago?
> >
> > How much work is it to re-establish the automatic update? For i18n.inc, we
> > have discussed the possibility of se
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> BTW Christian, could you eventually update the changes of i18n.inc that
> I've committed to www-user some days ago?
>
> How much work is it to re-establish the automatic update? For i18n.inc, we
> have discussed the possibility of setting up a non-symbolic link to
> po/i
How much work is it to re-establish the automatic update? For
i18n.inc, we
have discussed the possibility of setting up a non-symbolic link to
po/i18n.inc in branch (note that the file is not there yet). That
would ease
my work quite a bit. Do you think this is possible?
When I proposed tha
Christian Ridderström wrote:
>> Christian Ridderström wrote:
>>> I don't understand why there would be an extra new line after the '?>',
>>> nor do I get an extra line when I try running the script, so what gives?
>>
>> Maybe because I just fixed it? ;-)
>
> Thanks,
> Christian
BTW Christian, cou
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
I don't understand why there would be an extra new line after the '?>',
nor do I get an extra line when I try running the script, so what gives?
Maybe because I just fixed it? ;-)
Thanks,
Christian
http://www.lyx.
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I don't understand why there would be an extra new line after the '?>',
> nor do I get an extra line when I try running the script, so what gives?
Maybe because I just fixed it? ;-)
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28953
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/28954
Jürg
On Wednesday 20 February 2008 17:23:43 Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
> > Does it works now?
>
> Yes. Please commit to branch as well.
Done.
> Jürgen
--
José Abílio
José Matos wrote:
> Does it works now?
Yes. Please commit to branch as well.
Jürgen
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 20:15:56 Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I noted that postats.py does not work for me, unless I manually set LC_ALL
> to 'C' before running make i18n.inc (else, the msgmerge messages are in
> German).
On a second look I can't understand how the previous fix worked. I ha
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I noted that postats.py does not work for me, unless I manually set LC_ALL
> to 'C' before running make i18n.inc (else, the msgmerge messages are in
> German).
I do not see this problem here. José?
JMarc
20 matches
Mail list logo
