Re: path.h

1999-07-13 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Are we going to have it in support/filetools.h, or in lyxlib.h ? Put them in lyxlib.h for now, later we will spread them out depending on what the function provides. Lgb

Re: path.h

1999-07-07 Thread miyata
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjììnes) wrote: > we could in filetools make a "pseudo" namespace (since the compilers > we use do not always support namespaces): > > struct lyx { > static getcwd(...); > static chdir(...); > }; > > and use these in our code: >

Re: path.h

1999-07-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Is path.h in 1.1 low level enough to allow system specific code? | Since 1.1 uses GNU getopt, I can't use CPP macros | #define chdir _chdir2 | #define getcwd _getcwd2 | in os2_defines.h any longer. I'm thinking of moving the stuffs | to support/filetools.C and path.h