On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:36:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> OK, I was waiting for feedback on the patch. If Dekel says it works,
> I'll apply it. What about a changelog entry, or at least a description
> of what it does (for my bugfix list)?
The 1.2.0 math parser was dropping pairs of
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> OK, I was waiting for feedback on the patch. If Dekel says it
>> works, I'll apply it. What about a changelog entry, or at least a
>> description of what it does (for my bugfix list)?
Dekel> I already said that the patch works.
That's
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 01:36:50PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:53:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> >> [example]
>
> Andre> Ah... The patch has not yet been applied to 1.2.1cvs!
>
> Andre> So
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:53:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>> [example]
Andre> Ah... The patch has not yet been applied to 1.2.1cvs!
Andre> So it works for me but not for you.
OK, I was waiting for feedback on the patch. If Dek
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 06:50:24PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > So it works for me but not for you.
>
> Also works here with the patch.
So this probably could go into 1.2.1. But let Jean-Marc decide.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor d
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:27:26PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:53:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > [example]
>
> Ah... The patch has not yet been applied to 1.2.1cvs!
>
> So it works for me but not for you.
Also works here with the patch.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:53:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> [example]
Ah... The patch has not yet been applied to 1.2.1cvs!
So it works for me but not for you.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jeffer
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:53:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Attached.
> The math inset should be \foo{a_1}, but 1.2.1cvs reads it as \foo a_1.
I give up. Now it loads properly again and I have _nothing_ changed.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will no
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:53:56PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > So send me a test example please.
>
> Attached.
> The math inset should be \foo{a_1}, but 1.2.1cvs reads it as \foo a_1.
Weird. I thought I tried exactly this.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Secu
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 04:30:48PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:30:23PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > I have just checked with latest 1.2.1cvs, and the problem is still there.
>
> So send me a test example please.
>
Attached.
The math inset should be \foo{a_1}, but 1.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 05:30:23PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> I have just checked with latest 1.2.1cvs, and the problem is still there.
So send me a test example please.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 08:32:55AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 12:42:11AM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > The problem is that when you have for example \foo{a_{1}}, where \foo is
> > a macro that is not handled by LyX. Lyx1.2 will read it as \foo a_{1}
> > which is wrong (o
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 12:42:11AM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The problem is that when you have for example \foo{a_{1}}, where \foo is
> a macro that is not handled by LyX. Lyx1.2 will read it as \foo a_{1}
> which is wrong (only the a is passed to \foo).
This seems to work in 1.3.0cvs...
> I
Am Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2002 14:21 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:40:26PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Andre> wrote: What was worng? I forgot already...
>
> >> I think it was about removing extra {}.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:48:45PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:40:26PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Andre> What was worng? I forgot already...
> >
> > I think it was about removing extra {}. With 1.2.0, if I use \binom, I
> > get complaints on the console ab
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:40:26PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: What was worng? I forgot already...
>> I think it was about removing extra {}. With 1.2.0, if I use
>> \binom, I get complaints on the console about extr
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:40:26PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> What was worng? I forgot already...
>
> I think it was about removing extra {}. With 1.2.0, if I use \binom, I
> get complaints on the console about extra {} and on screen I have
> extra red braces abround my binomials
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:10:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: Try the attached and tell me if it works.
>> So? Does it work?
Andre> What was worng? I forgot already...
I think it was about removing extra {}. With
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:10:30PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> Try the attached and tell me if it works.
>
> So? Does it work?
What was worng? I forgot already...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, eithe
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 06:43:50AM +0200, Ulrich Günther wrote:
>> I would be very glad if there was a temporary patch.
Andre> Try the attached and tell me if it works.
So? Does it work?
JMarc
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 06:43:50AM +0200, Ulrich Günther wrote:
> I would be very glad if there was a temporary patch.
Try the attached and tell me if it works.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferso
21 matches
Mail list logo
