On Friday 02 March 2001 13:56, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On 2 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | >
> | > | On Friday 02 March 2001 11:09, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > | > I am happier a
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 2 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | On Friday 02 March 2001 11:09, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > I am happier about this. So if you feel that this solution is workable
| > | > and power
On 2 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Friday 02 March 2001 11:09, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > I am happier about this. So if you feel that this solution is workable
> | > and powerfull enough use it.
> |
> | Ok, Lars. This is ready t
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 02 March 2001 11:09, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > I am happier about this. So if you feel that this solution is workable
| > and powerfull enough use it.
|
| Ok, Lars. This is ready to go once again, so if you'd cast your eye over
| BRANCH
On Friday 02 March 2001 11:09, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I am happier about this. So if you feel that this solution is workable
> and powerfull enough use it.
Ok, Lars. This is ready to go once again, so if you'd cast your eye over
BRANCH_MVC...
If you're happy with it, then I'll make the pa
On Friday 02 March 2001 11:09, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Completely safe, I think. Are you happy with this approach? (Please
comment,
> | because I'll only go on to modify all the xforms dialogs that use a
> | ButtonController if you're happy.
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Completely safe, I think. Are you happy with this approach? (Please comment,
| because I'll only go on to modify all the xforms dialogs that use a
| ButtonController if you're happy. If you need me to commit first to have a
| proper look, then please