Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:13:37PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | "Keep the patch in your local tree and try again in the 1.4 cycle after
| > | you've seen a black cat crossing the street and the phase of the moon has
| > | changed"
| >
| > No
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:13:37PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | "Keep the patch in your local tree and try again in the 1.4 cycle after
> | you've seen a black cat crossing the street and the phase of the moon has
> | changed"
>
> No... but perhaps when a my_getline has been implemented.
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 07:13:37PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Some how you seem eager to include anything as long as it does not
> touch mathed...
>
Well spotted.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| "Keep the patch in your local tree and try again in the 1.4 cycle after
| you've seen a black cat crossing the street and the phase of the moon has
| changed"
No... but perhaps when a my_getline has been implemented.
as per discussion...
| PS: From
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 05:46:59PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Claus Hentschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | The problem seems to be that Cygwin does offer two modes for mounting but
> | doesn't support opening files in both modes. IMHO the current 'patch' is
> | sufficient to care a
"Claus Hentschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The problem seems to be that Cygwin does offer two modes for mounting but
| doesn't support opening files in both modes. IMHO the current 'patch' is
| sufficient to care about! We should leave it included.
the patch as-is is too ugly.
--
L
