Re: new menu layout

2003-09-19 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:23:50PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > OK when "them" is a very small number. But at one time, my "them" Well Angus' suggestion is a simple and effective one... regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.

Re: new menu layout

2003-09-19 Thread Garst R. Reese
John Levon wrote: > Existing users are likely to read the announcement Surely you jest, but it's Friday, so I'll forgive you for not adding a smiley. > or have a Garst to tell them. OK when "them" is a very small number. But at one time, my "them" approached 100. Of course, they were split betw

Re: new menu layout

2003-09-19 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:56:00PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > LyX opens up splash.lyx when lyx is run for the first time. Why not > put it there; we'd need someway of recognising that the new version Super idea. regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same per

Re: new menu layout

2003-09-19 Thread Angus Leeming
John Levon wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 05:25:22AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > >> At the very least, the splash screen should boldly announce the new >> ui and explain how to select the old one. > > The splash screen isn't a good place IMO. Instead we should make it > very prominent in th

Re: new menu layout

2003-09-19 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 05:25:22AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > At the very least, the splash screen should boldly announce the new ui > and explain how to select the old one. The splash screen isn't a good place IMO. Instead we should make it very prominent in the release announcement. New use

Re: new menu layout

2003-09-19 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 09:42:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | The problem is different defaults in 1.3 and 1.4 >> >> That is not a problem. >> >> Or are you saying that we can never change de

Re: new menu layout

2003-09-19 Thread Garst R. Reese
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | The problem is different defaults in 1.3 and 1.4 > > That is not a problem. > > Or are you saying that we can never change defaults once we have > chosen one the first time? > > -- > Lgb My 2 pennies default

Re: new menu layout

2003-09-19 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 09:42:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | The problem is different defaults in 1.3 and 1.4 > > That is not a problem. > > Or are you saying that we can never change defaults once we have > chosen one the first time? No

Re: new menu layout

2003-09-19 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | The problem is different defaults in 1.3 and 1.4 That is not a problem. Or are you saying that we can never change defaults once we have chosen one the first time? -- Lgb

Re: new menu layout

2003-09-18 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:02:39PM -0400, Kuba Ober wrote: > On czwartek 18 wrzesie? 2003 12:50 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Has anybody thought about how 'support' would look like if everybody has > > a differen UI? > > > > Q: How do I xxx? > > > > A1: Layout->Paragraph > > A2: Edit->Paragraph Set

Re: new menu layout

2003-09-18 Thread Kuba Ober
On czwartek 18 wrzesień 2003 12:50 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Has anybody thought about how 'support' would look like if everybody has > a differen UI? > > Q: How do I xxx? > > A1: Layout->Paragraph > A2: Edit->Paragraph Setting > A3: ... > > This is creating confusion for no good reason. Consider

Re: new menu layout

2003-09-18 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 06:50:38PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Has anybody thought about how 'support' would look like if everybody has > a differen UI? It's Friday *tomorrow* not today bud. > This is creating confusion for no good reason. I already get enough spam, thanks. -- Khendon's Law: