Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 03-Feb-2000 Michael Meskes wrote:
| > On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 03:58:02PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >> | + for (int i = 0; i < datetmp_len; i++) {
| >>
| >> In C++ it is adviced to use preincrement instead of postincrement:
| >
| > Co
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Because sometimes it is necessary to create an extraneous copy of the
| iterator when using postincrements. This wastes resources.
|
| It's more or less the following:
|
| ++i:
|i = i + 1
|return i
|
| i++:
|temp = i
On 03-Feb-2000 Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 03:58:02PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | + for (int i = 0; i < datetmp_len; i++) {
>>
>> In C++ it is adviced to use preincrement instead of postincrement:
>
> Could anyone please enlighten me and tell me why preincrem
>
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 03:58:02PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > | + for (int i = 0; i < datetmp_len; i++) {
> >
> > In C++ it is adviced to use preincrement instead of postincrement:
>
> Could anyone please enlighten me and tell me why preincrement is preferred
> over postincre
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 03:58:02PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | + for (int i = 0; i < datetmp_len; i++) {
>
> In C++ it is adviced to use preincrement instead of postincrement:
Could anyone please enlighten me and tell me why preincrement is preferred
over postincrement?
Michael
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 03:58:02PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[...]
>
> | + for (int i = 0; i < datetmp_len; i++) {
>
> In C++ it is adviced to use preincrement instead of postincrement:
>
> for (int i = 0; i < datetmp_len; ++i) {
>
Forget my ignorance, I have read the Efe
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| ??? I'm more confused then before (and I swear I didn't drink any alcohol
| yesterday AND today ;)
C cannot handle more than one locale at a time so you have to resort
to setting the locale in all functions that need it. C++ OTOH can have
several local
On 03-Feb-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| > This is a C way of doing it since C can't handle several locales at
>| > the same time. C++ and it wonderful Standard Library on the other hand
>| > does support this. And IMHO we should use the C++ loca
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > This is a C way of doing it since C can't handle several locales at
| > the same time. C++ and it wonderful Standard Library on the other hand
| > does support this. And IMHO we should use the C++ locale support.
| >
|
| Well then please enlighten m
"John D. Blair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A couple of _small_ comments on the code. Jurgen, you should read this
too.
| + // jdblair: experimental date-insert command
| + newFunc(LFUN_DATE_INSERT,"date-insert",
| + "", Noop);
^ I know that I have been lazy,
On 03-Feb-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| IDEA for setting locale on the document language:
>| -
>|
>| We store the different babel-languages in tex-strings.C::tex_babel[].
>| Would it be possible t
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| IDEA for setting locale on the document language:
| -
|
| We store the different babel-languages in tex-strings.C::tex_babel[].
| Would it be possible to instead of having only the name a structure like t
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > 4. Changed the command from date-insert to insert-date (could someone tell
> >me if this is right I don't know in what direction the commands should be
> >and a look at LyXAction reveals that there are insert_xxx and xxx_insert
> >commands around, so what???
On 01-Feb-2000 Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Your editor is broken. It obviously failed to show you lines 26 and
> 27 when you worked on LyXAction.C :-)
Now I see it, my editor really had the function hide-file-comment-for-
how-to-know-to-do-things enabled so I didn't see that lines #:O)
> PS:
>
> 4. Changed the command from date-insert to insert-date (could someone tell
>me if this is right I don't know in what direction the commands should be
>and a look at LyXAction reveals that there are insert_xxx and xxx_insert
>commands around, so what???)
Your editor is broken. It ob
On 01-Feb-2000 John D. Blair wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hello Blair!
> Thanks much for all of your excellent work on LyX. I'm really happy
> with what it can do now, and I'm looking forward to everything you're
> still working on.
>
#:O)
> At any rate, I've attached a patch to implement a simple ne
16 matches
Mail list logo
