On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 05:06:25PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I forget what the grand scheme leading to IU was, but I understand that the
> hardest parts are the bits already in 1.4.x. This may, of course, be
> wishful thinking...
The unified cursor stuff was "the big" thing. Formerly we had on
Andreas Vox wrote:
> Kornelia Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>
>> It's a bit sad as this was supposed to be a place where IU shines.
>> *sniff*
>
> Is there a lyx-devel-glossary somewhere to look up 'IU' ? :-)
> (No, searching the archive does ot help)
In this case:
Mathed has some e
On Monday 28 February 2005 16:41, Andreas Vox wrote:
>
> Is there a lyx-devel-glossary somewhere to look up 'IU' ? :-)
> (No, searching the archive does ot help)
Inset Unification(?!)... :-)
> /Andreas
--
José Abílio
Kornelia Poenitz wrote:
> Fix for recent crash attached.
Nope. Please attach.
--
Angus
Kornelia Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> It's a bit sad as this was supposed to be a place where IU shines.
> *sniff*
Is there a lyx-devel-glossary somewhere to look up 'IU' ? :-)
(No, searching the archive does ot help)
/Andreas
