On 7/26/23 18:46, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 07:51:07PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Documentation in lyx.rpm.README mentions qt4 + i386, I'm not sure how
much is our rpm-build being used during recent years...
Yes, that seems to fix it. It's using Qt5, as far as I can se
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 07:51:07PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> >Documentation in lyx.rpm.README mentions qt4 + i386, I'm not sure how
> >much is our rpm-build being used during recent years...
>
> Yes, that seems to fix it. It's using Qt5, as far as I can see.
It's now in. Pavel
--
lyx
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 07:51:07PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 7/24/23 05:52, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 08:19:29PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> > > RPM build errors:
> > > Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> > > /usr/share/metainfo/org.lyx
On 7/24/23 05:52, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 08:19:29PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/metainfo/org.lyx.LyX.metainfo.xml
Does this patch help?
Documentation in lyx.rpm.README mentions qt4 + i3
On Mon, 2023-07-24 at 11:52 +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Does this patch help?
I would expect this to fix the issue.
> Documentation in lyx.rpm.README mentions qt4 + i386, I'm not sure how
> much is our rpm-build being used during recent years...
I have dabbled about this before. :-)
The issue is
On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 08:19:29PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> RPM build errors:
> Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> /usr/share/metainfo/org.lyx.LyX.metainfo.xml
>
Does this patch help?
Documentation in lyx.rpm.README mentions qt4 + i386, I'm not sure how
much is our r
On 7/22/23 20:10, José Matos wrote:
On Sat, 2023-07-22 at 23:59 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I suspect rpmdist dislikes the hyphens after RC1. Are you sure that
this is typical of rpm naming? You could try underscores instead.
In the past our release nme were more like lyx-2.4.0rc1
Jean-
On Sat, 2023-07-22 at 23:59 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I suspect rpmdist dislikes the hyphens after RC1. Are you sure that
> this is typical of rpm naming? You could try underscores instead.
>
> In the past our release nme were more like lyx-2.4.0rc1
Jean-Marc is right regarding the nam
Le 22/07/2023 à 21:05, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
I've finally decided to use the rpmdist target rather than installing
directly, but it is failing here:
$(LN_S) $(srcdir)/lib/images/lyx.png . ; \
The problem is that LN_S does not seem to be defined, so it is trying to
execute the i
Am Sat, 22 Jul 2023 15:05:11 -0400
schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck :
> I've finally decided to use the rpmdist target rather than installing
> directly, but it is failing here:
>
> $(LN_S) $(srcdir)/lib/images/lyx.png . ; \
>
> The problem is that LN_S does not seem to be defined, so it is t
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 06:01:29PM +, José Matos wrote:
> >[ ] For some undisclosed technical reason that I will never be told
> >about.
>
> To simulate a clean build without any contamination from the surrounding
> environment.
If the result is the same working package in both
On Monday 19 March 2007 5:11:49 pm Andre Poenitz wrote:
> In some very successful attempt to waste some time I run 'make rpmdist'
> and now have a few questions (apart from the obvoius 'Is it really
> supposed to fail?' and possibly 'Why?')
>
> 1. Why contain 3781 out of 7528 file names in the .tar
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:01:04PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 27 April 2006 15:54, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > This fix the problem for me. Is this an aceptable fix?
> > Or should we do the fix through sys.path instead?
>
> It is an acceptable fix, no doubt. :-)
It worked for me
On Thursday 27 April 2006 15:54, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This fix the problem for me. Is this an aceptable fix?
> Or should we do the fix through sys.path instead?
It is an acceptable fix, no doubt. :-)
> (actually with this patch we can get rid of the sys.pach in doc_toc.py
> if we want t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| I'll see if I can find a fix.
This fix the problem for me. Is this an aceptable fix?
Or should we do the fix through sys.path instead?
(actually with this patch we can get rid of the sys.pach in doc_toc.py
if we want to.)
Index: lib/doc/depend.p
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:22:33AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:02:44PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > | > ...
| > | > | > > note that lyx2lyx_
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:22:33AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:02:44PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > | > ...
> | > | > > note that lyx2lyx_version.py.in is absent.
> | > | >
> | > | > It is not when
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:02:44PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > ...
| > | > > note that lyx2lyx_version.py.in is absent.
| > | >
| > | > It is not when I do the same here.
| > |
| > | Do a "make dist" then use the resulting tar-ball
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:02:44PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > ...
> | > > note that lyx2lyx_version.py.in is absent.
> | >
> | > It is not when I do the same here.
> |
> | Do a "make dist" then use the resulting tar-ball to try and make
> | lyx, you will see the problem then. lyx2ly
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Is anyone looking at this problem?
|
| Do a "make dist" and try to use the tarball. You won't succeed, since
| lyx2lyx_version.py is not there.
|
| From: "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Su
Am Sonntag, 23. April 2006 05:49 schrieb Kayvan A. Sylvan:
> Is anyone looking at this problem?
Yes, I sent a patch based on Jean-Marcs idea yesterday. I am only awaiting
input from Lars before it goes in, since he also wanted to have a look.
Georg
;Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: make rpmdist failure (1.5.0svn)
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:38:05PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
>
> > Why does not show lyx2lyx_version
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:38:05PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
>
> > Why does not show lyx2lyx_version.py.in in svn?
> >
> > in the lyx2lyx directory:
> ...
> > note that lyx2lyx_version.py.in is absent.
>
> It is not when I do the same here.
Do a "make dist" then use the res
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Yet:
| $ svn add lyx2lyx_version.py.in
| svn: warning: 'lyx2lyx_version.py.in' is already under version control
|
| Any advice from svn experts? :-)
svn st?
Looks fine from repo side:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ svn ls svn://svn.lyx.org/lyx/lyx-devel/trunk
Jose' Matos wrote:
> Why does not show lyx2lyx_version.py.in in svn?
>
> in the lyx2lyx directory:
...
> note that lyx2lyx_version.py.in is absent.
It is not when I do the same here.
Georg
Why does not show lyx2lyx_version.py.in in svn?
in the lyx2lyx directory:
$ svn ls
ChangeLog
LyX.py
Makefile.am
lyx2lyx
lyx_0_10.py
lyx_0_12.py
lyx_1_0_0.py
lyx_1_0_1.py
lyx_1_1_4.py
lyx_1_1_5.py
lyx_1_1_6.py
lyx_1_1_6fix3.py
lyx_1_2.py
lyx_1_3.py
lyx_1_4.py
lyx_1_5.py
parser_tools.py
profiling.p
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 00:02, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/home/kayvan/src/lyx/qtbuild/lib/doc'
> python ../../../lyx/lib/doc/doc_toc.py
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "../../../lyx/lib/doc/doc_toc.py", line 34, in ?
> import LyX
> File "../../../ly
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:38:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | I seem to remember this worked a while ago.
| > | Now I get:
| >
| > You probably have a too old gettext installed on your box.
| >
| > gettext 0.11.4 works fine.
|
| 0.10.37 d
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 02:38:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | I seem to remember this worked a while ago.
> | Now I get:
>
> You probably have a too old gettext installed on your box.
>
> gettext 0.11.4 works fine.
0.10.37 does not.
0.11.5 seem to work though.
Now I get dozens of
m
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I seem to remember this worked a while ago.
| Now I get:
You probably have a too old gettext installed on your box.
gettext 0.11.4 works fine.
--
Lgb
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 12:11:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | fails here with:
>
> You are using srcdir != builddir?
>
> I am not sure that this will work...
>
> it seems that the spec file is not found at all...
Yes, that's the problem
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 12:11:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> You are using srcdir != builddir?
Aah... Yes. I remember now that I had problem because of that last time I
tried, too...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they d
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| fails here with:
You are using srcdir != builddir?
I am not sure that this will work...
it seems that the spec file is not found at all...
--
Lgb
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:52:14PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:46:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> > And you are sure you do not have any strange .deps or .libs dirs
>> > w/files?
>>
>> This is 'rm -rf lyx-d
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:06:15PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> rpm -q automake
>> automake-1.5-8
>
| Ok. 1.5.1 now.
>
>
| Building Makefile templates...
| .
| src/Makefile.am:12: LIBS was set wi
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I haven't paid any attention to these different make targets. Could someone
| tell me which one I should use if I wanted to make a tarball for the DEC
| Alpha users out there? "make dist"?
binary distribution?
make bindist of course
| And can I bu
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:56:51AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> It is now in ftp://ftp.sylvan.com/pub/lyx/devel
I just noticed that the dependencies are "redhat like".
There is neither tetex-latex nor tetex-dvi on SuSE, the stuff is in
te_latex and tetex proper.
[OTOH, SuSE users a used to
I haven't paid any attention to these different make targets. Could someone
tell me which one I should use if I wanted to make a tarball for the DEC
Alpha users out there? "make dist"?
And can I build that with src dir != build dir?
Angus
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:36:16PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:16:52AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > > How does rpm now what spec file to use?
> >
> > It looks for a spec file in the tarball.
>
> Ok. It works when build with sourcedir == builddir and automake 1
On Thursday 16 May 2002 4:36 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> PS: I've put a lyx-1.2.0pre5-1-suse73.i386.rpm into yur incoming/forlyx.
> Actually it was called lyx-1.3.0cvs-1.i386.rpm, but we are not in the
> 1.3.0series, are we?
Since Lars moved 1.2 off into it's own branch, we are yes.
Angus
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:16:52AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > How does rpm now what spec file to use?
>
> It looks for a spec file in the tarball.
Ok. It works when build with sourcedir == builddir and automake 1.5
(neither 1.4 nor 1.6). Should be documented somehow. Maybe even some kin
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:27:09PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > And are they ? (in spec file)
>
> Where is the spec file anyway? (I have not used 'rpm -ta' yet)
>
> development/lyx.spec?
>
> There isn't any in the .tar.gz...
Yes,
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:27:09PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> And are they ? (in spec file)
Where is the spec file anyway? (I have not used 'rpm -ta' yet)
development/lyx.spec?
There isn't any in the .tar.gz...
How does rpm now what spec file to use?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Fre
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:52:14PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:46:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > And you are sure you do not have any strange .deps or .libs dirs
> > w/files?
>
> This is 'rm -rf lyx-devel lyx-build ; cvs co lyx-devel ; cd lyx-devel ;
> .
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:12:18AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Is there anything special required to run this?
>
> I was trying it for the first time and got soon stuck with
>
>
> make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/lyx/lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2/xforms'
> make[4]: *** No rule to make t
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:35:36PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Ok. 1.5.1 now.
Where do we document this ?
Thou must use 1.5.1. No more, no less. 1.5.1 must be the number thou
must use, and the number of the use must be 1.5.1. 1.6 shalt thou not
use, nor either use thou 1.4, excepting that tho
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:06:15PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> rpm -q automake
> automake-1.5-8
Ok. 1.5.1 now.
Building Makefile templates...
.
src/Makefile.am:12: LIBS was set with `+=' and is now set with `='
src/frontend
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I get a step further if I replace the 'noinst_' prefix with 'EXTRA_' but I
| really don't know what I am doing there...
That is not where you want to change things.
--
Lgb
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:46:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> And you are sure you do not have any strange .deps or .libs dirs
>> w/files?
>
| This is 'rm -rf lyx-devel lyx-build ; cvs co lyx-devel ; cd lyx-devel ;
| ./autogen ; cd ../lyx-bu
I get a step further if I replace the 'noinst_' prefix with 'EXTRA_' but I
really don't know what I am doing there...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:46:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And you are sure you do not have any strange .deps or .libs dirs
> w/files?
This is 'rm -rf lyx-devel lyx-build ; cvs co lyx-devel ; cd lyx-devel ;
./autogen ; cd ../lyx-build ; ../lyx-devel/configure'
[no script, typed by
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:30:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Look lower and see the link_files target.
>>
>> It is possible that on your bot it should be
>> $(nodist_libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS).
>
| The problem seems to be that automake fails a
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> It is possible that on your bot it should be
>> >> $(nodist_libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS).
>> >
>> | Well, it is just $(libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS)
>>
>> Yes, and:
>>
>>
>> >> It is
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> It is possible that on your bot it should be
> >> $(nodist_libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS).
> >
> | Well, it is just $(libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS)
>
> Yes, and:
>
>
> >> It is possible that on your bot it should be
> >> $(nodist_l
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:30:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Look lower and see the link_files target.
>
> It is possible that on your bot it should be
> $(nodist_libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS).
The problem seems to be that automake fails and link_files is not called
afterwards.
If I touch
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:30:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Look lower and see the link_files target.
>>
>> It is possible that on your bot it should be
>> $(nodist_libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS).
>
| Well, it is just $(libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS)
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:30:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Look lower and see the link_files target.
>
> It is possible that on your bot it should be
> $(nodist_libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS).
Well, it is just $(libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS)
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in o
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:19:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> |nodist_libqt2xforms_la_SOURCES = \
>> |bmtable.h \
>> |bmtable.c \
>> |combox.h \
>> |combox.C \
>> | [.]
>> >
>> >
>> |
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:19:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | nodist_libqt2xforms_la_SOURCES = \
> | bmtable.h \
> | bmtable.c \
> | combox.h \
> | combox.C \
> | [.]
> >
> >
> | This somehow does not look sound
>
> To me
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:20:59AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Then you have something fishy in your source/build tree or on your
>> box, I use "make dist" "make distdir" and "make distcheck" all the
>> time.
>
| 'make dist' already does not wo
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:20:59AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Then you have something fishy in your source/build tree or on your
> box, I use "make dist" "make distdir" and "make distcheck" all the
> time.
'make dist' already does not work on a clean check out.
> Are you trying to compi
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Is there anything special required to run this?
>
| I was trying it for the first time and got soon stuck with
>
>
| make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/lyx/lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2/xforms'
| make[4]: *** No rule to make target `libqt2xforms.la.c',
62 matches
Mail list logo
