On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 20:15, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > On Monday 02 December 2002 6:02 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > > wherever it lives I need to know the relative path to the LyX it came
> > > with.. ideally people who are intrepid betatesters
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 04:49, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Monday 02 December 2002 6:02 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > wherever it lives I need to know the relative path to the LyX it came
> > with.. ideally people who are intrepid betatesters could alias lyx to
> > the script and it would figure out wh
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Monday 02 December 2002 6:02 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > wherever it lives I need to know the relative path to the LyX it came
> > with.. ideally people who are intrepid betatesters could alias lyx to
> > the script and it would figure out where lyx
On Monday 02 December 2002 6:02 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> wherever it lives I need to know the relative path to the LyX it came
> with.. ideally people who are intrepid betatesters could alias lyx to
> the script and it would figure out where lyx
Why not invoke it with either
$ lyxdbg
or
On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 02:07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Darren" == Darren Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> PS: wonder if someone else has noticed the charm of your script!?!
>
> Darren> or our script =)
>
> Darren> Doubt it - nobody else seems to be replying. I suppose they
>
> "Darren" == Darren Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> PS: wonder if someone else has noticed the charm of your script!?!
Darren> or our script =)
Darren> Doubt it - nobody else seems to be replying. I suppose they
Darren> will cotton on when the next segfault appears and somebody has
D
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 23:23, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Darren Freeman wrote:
> > ... or provide clever command-line options that can be requested by
> > whoever is bugfixing to whoever is running lyxdbg =) Why not have a few
> > trace profiles to choose from? Each one specifies what kinds of info to
> >
Darren Freeman wrote:
> ... or provide clever command-line options that can be requested by
> whoever is bugfixing to whoever is running lyxdbg =) Why not have a few
> trace profiles to choose from? Each one specifies what kinds of info to
> probe, like including the files you mention, or what inst
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 23:03, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Darren Freeman wrote:
> >
> > One other thing - an earlier version included the output of lyx
> > --version in the trace, which provided a lot of useful info. Shouldn't
> > it go back? Esp. now that zipping is included.
>
> Oops, have I removed tha
Darren Freeman wrote:
>
> One other thing - an earlier version included the output of lyx
> --version in the trace, which provided a lot of useful info. Shouldn't
> it go back? Esp. now that zipping is included.
Oops, have I removed that? Was this there in one of your earlier versions
of the scri
Rob,
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 14:06, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Darren Freeman wrote:
> >
> > Play with it, I think I'm right =)
>
> Yes, you are. I apologize for causing confusion.
>
> Though I would suggest not to place the lyxdbg script in src/lyx, but
> elsewhere. src/ has the source code; the script
Darren Freeman wrote:
>
> I'd have to actually try it, but if the shell script is located in the
> lyx directory but the user is currently elsewhere, then I expect ./lyx
> to be looking where the user is, not where the script is. Unless sh
> changes directory automatically to where the script is,
On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 20:30, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Darren Freeman wrote:
> > On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 16:18, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> >>Darren, have a look at v0.3b :)
> >>Prettyfied it a bit; functionality is same.
> >
> > Yes, but still much prettier.
> >
> > One functionality change is that it now doesn
Darren Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 16:18, Rob Lahaye wrote:
>>Darren, have a look at v0.3b :)
>>Prettyfied it a bit; functionality is same.
>
> Yes, but still much prettier.
>
> One functionality change is that it now doesn't check for lyx in the
> same directory as $0 which is what I
On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 16:18, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> Darren Freeman wrote:
> > Rob, all,
> >
> > I just overhauled lyxdbg again, now v0.3
>
> Darren, have a look at v0.3b :)
> Prettyfied it a bit; functionality is same.
Yes, but still much prettier.
One functionality change is that it now doesn't c
Darren Freeman wrote:
> Rob, all,
>
> I just overhauled lyxdbg again, now v0.3
Darren, have a look at v0.3b :)
Prettyfied it a bit; functionality is same.
Rob.
---
#!/bin/sh
#
# This file is copyright 2002 Darren Freeman and Rob Lahaye.
# It is covered by the GNU General Public License which wa
16 matches
Mail list logo
