> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 03:27:05PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote: Do people really use the externall dialog much ?
>> I think they do.
John> FWIW, I'd have absolutely *zero* problem with fortnightly stable
John> releases :)
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 03:27:05PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> Do people really use the externall dialog much ?
>
> I think they do.
FWIW, I'd have absolutely *zero* problem with fortnightly stable releases :)
john
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:03:40PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John> wrote:
>> Is this bad enough that we should consider releasing 1.3.2 soon?
John> Do people really use the externall dialog much ?
I think they do.
JMarc
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 01:58:03PM +, John Levon wrote:
> > Is this bad enough that we should consider releasing 1.3.2 soon?
>
> Do people really use the externall dialog much ?
I do for xfig.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do th
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:03:40PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Is this bad enough that we should consider releasing 1.3.2 soon?
Do people really use the externall dialog much ?
> Is there a workaround?
Press apply then press close should be ok
john
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:01:23AM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
>> Closing an external inset in lyx-1.3.1 or 1.3.2cvs may crash. It is
>> reproducible
John> Sheesh, well I'm a genius I made a wrong patch, fixed it,
John> then applie
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:01:23AM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Closing an external inset in lyx-1.3.1 or 1.3.2cvs may crash. It is
> reproducible
Sheesh, well I'm a genius I made a wrong patch, fixed it, then
applied the wrong patch anyway and didn't notice. Great !
Expect a fix soon
t
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:01:23AM +0100, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Closing an external inset in lyx-1.3.1 or 1.3.2cvs may crash. It is
> reproducible
> with one of my files, the backtrace is at the end of this message.
Damnit, how the hell did this happen :(
I'll look into it - time to build 1.3
