>
> I tried 2.95 but got the error at the start of this thread... might be
> something to do with the architecture cos I'm running Debian on a
> powerpc with the benh kernel?
May well be...I'm running on an AMD, with stock 2.4.20, and it all went well.
Rod
__
> I think there is a way to force it, but gcc 3.2 compiles pretty
> easily.
OK.. I'm trying to compile it now rather than depend on binaries...
>
> I'm using Debian 3.0, and have found that gcc2.95 compiles lyx fine,
> with the qt front. gcc 3.2 won't unless you compile your qt libs with
> it as
I think there is a way to force it, but gcc 3.2 compiles pretty easily.
I'm using Debian 3.0, and have found that gcc2.95 compiles lyx fine, with
the qt front. gcc 3.2 won't unless you compile your qt libs with it as
well.
Rod
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Nirmal Govind wrote:
> > Known issue... althou
> Known issue... although it seems to work fine with GCC 3.2. Although I
> think the newer Qt might be causing some issues.
Thanks Owen.. I'm trying to upgrade to gcc 3.2.. having trouble with
Debian cribbing abt dependencies for binutils which supposedly clashes
with modutils! Wonder if there's a
> Hi.. I compiled lyx 1.3.0 with the qt frontend.. since earlier I was
> getting crashes on startup with the cvs version, I decided to get a
> fresh version of QT also and compiled qt 3.1.1. Please let me know if
> there's a fix to this... thanks...
Known issue... although it seems to work fine
