Re: llncs.layout

2002-11-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:59:59AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Dekel> wrote: It seems that llncs has many commands that are not Dekel> available in llncs.cls: Dekel> petit,journalname,dedication,subtitle,transtitle,headnote,date,keywor

Re: llncs.layout

2002-10-31 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 08:59:59AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Dekel> It seems that llncs has many commands that are not available in > Dekel> llncs.cls: > Dekel> petit,journalname,dedication,subtitle,transtitle,headnote,date,keywords > Dekel> transsummary,trankey,acknowledgements,acknowle

Re: llncs.layout

2002-10-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 03:37:00PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Dekel> wrote: >> > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Dekel> I did try it. Current definition gives errors when running Dekel> latex, while changing

Re: llncs.layout

2002-10-27 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 03:37:00PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dekel> I did try it. Current definition gives errors when running > Dekel> latex, while changing to normal thebibliography works. > > Good. Thanks. > > Since you ha

Re: llncs.layout

2002-10-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> I did try it. Current definition gives errors when running Dekel> latex, while changing to normal thebibliography works. Good. Thanks. Since you have llncs.cls at hand, could you have a look at the Keyword layouts. It seems to me tha

Re: llncs.layout

2002-10-24 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> Why does the Bibliography in llncs.layout tries to redefine the Dekel> tehbibliography environment: Dekel> Style Bibliography LatexName lyxbibliography ... Preamble Dekel> \newcommand{\lyxbibliography}{\thebibliography{References}% De

Re: [patch] layouts fixuup (was: Re: llncs.layout)

2002-10-24 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:00:40PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Also, llncs.layout is currently broken as it does not include stdfloats.inc > | and stdcounters.inc. As there are other layouts with this behavior, I think > | that the best solution

[patch] layouts fixuup (was: Re: llncs.layout)

2002-10-24 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Also, llncs.layout is currently broken as it does not include stdfloats.inc | and stdcounters.inc. As there are other layouts with this behavior, I think | that the best solution for this is to create a base .inc file which will be | included by all the art

Re: llncs.layout

2002-10-23 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 07:28:35PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > Why does the Bibliography in llncs.layout tries to redefine the > tehbibliography environment: > > This just gives latex error. I don't understand why we are not using > LatexName thebibliography Also, llncs.layout is curre