On 11/17/2009 02:40 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
My plan would be a stepwise approach,
* finish the optimizations/cleanup for layout2layout,
* do a similar first step for lyx2lyx,
* in the process, find out what coud go into the "general library"
* organize LyX's Python scripts in a "pyLyX" Python
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 07:40:24 Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2009-11-14, José Matos wrote:
> >
> > Some of this could be applied to lyx2lyx, could you take a look, please?
>
> What is the minimal Python version we have to care for with LyX 1.6.x?
2.3.4
FWIW the last .4 is related with some unic
On 2009-11-14, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 November 2009 08:54:13 Guenter Milde wrote:
...
>> There are further (not so important) optimizations/cleanups possible.
>> These are left as an exercise for the reader ;-)
> Some of this could be applied to lyx2lyx, could you take a look, please?
On Tuesday 10 November 2009 08:54:13 Guenter Milde wrote:
I am trying to reply since yesterday morning so better to send some snippets
than not to reply at all. :-)
I like the patch and I will try to give some of the reasons why the original
code was as it was.
> Some explanations:
>
> * trim
On 11/13/2009 07:27 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Guenter Milde wrote:
Dear LyX developers,
at http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3605, I was asked to send my patch to the
lyx-devel list. My first attempt (via mail) seems to have failed, so I try
again (via news).
Jose could you do a review?
Guenter Milde wrote:
> Dear LyX developers,
>
> at http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/3605, I was asked to send my patch to the
> lyx-devel list. My first attempt (via mail) seems to have failed, so I try
> again (via news).
Jose could you do a review?
>
> On 26.10.09, LyX Ticket Tracker wrote:
> >
