Re: Latest mathed

2001-09-12 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 04:52:39PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > I think so. Incidentally, what about my earlier feature request about showing > the "\"? Ok.. I tried it. It looks ugly on things like "sin" which we are supposed "to know" but which we don't know anymore after the re-vamp of math

Re: Latest mathed

2001-09-12 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 12 September 2001 14:25, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 01:37:52PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > A few comments, André: > > > > * superscripts look Ok again but subscripts are very low. > > I have to figure out what TeX does... Currently I just put the subscript >

Re: Latest mathed

2001-09-12 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 01:37:52PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > A few comments, André: > > * superscripts look Ok again but subscripts are very low. I have to figure out what TeX does... Currently I just put the subscript "below" the "nucleus" - which is wrong... I could put it a few pixels hig

Re: latest mathed

2001-09-11 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 11 September 2001 15:23, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 02:03:44PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Displays of macros within an equation are broken. Data is still there (move > > into the macro and it expands correctly, but all I see from outside is a > > little blue

Re: latest mathed

2001-09-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 02:03:44PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Displays of macros within an equation are broken. Data is still there (move > into the macro and it expands correctly, but all I see from outside is a > little blue frame. Could you send me a small example please? I cannot repro

Re: latest mathed

2001-09-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 02:47:46PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > - Moving the cursor with the mouse is broken. For example, I can't move into > a subscript or into an \underbrace. > - The pink frame for x_{} is wrong Both should be fixed now. Andre' -- André Pönitz .

Re: latest mathed

2001-09-11 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 11 September 2001 12:47, Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 01:24:03PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > I've probably broken a thing or two in the cursor. The only thing I am > > aware of that is "unusual" is that backspace/delete deletes the whole atom, > > not just the "nu

Re: latest mathed

2001-09-11 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 01:24:03PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > I've probably broken a thing or two in the cursor. The only thing I am > aware of that is "unusual" is that backspace/delete deletes the whole atom, > not just the "nucleus". - Moving the cursor with the mouse is broken. For exampl