> "Mikhail" == Mikhail T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mikhail> The patch is for configure.ac, which I don't use :) I don't
Mikhail> even have autoconf-2.61 (only 2.59), which is needed to
Mikhail> regenerate configure after applying your patch. I guess, the
Mikhail> patch would work...
José,
> "Mikhail" == Mikhail T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mikhail> The patch is for configure.ac, which I don't use :) I don't
Mikhail> even have autoconf-2.61 (only 2.59), which is needed to
Mikhail> regenerate configure after applying your patch.
Actually, any autoconf >= 2.52 would do. Anyway
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Mikhail> 2. -lc -- explicitly linking with libc is wrong, AFAIK, but
Mikhail> the configure-generated Makefiles do this. This was an issue
Mikhail> with earlier LyX versions as well.
Would the attached patch be OK? (the tex2lyx part is unrelated but
should not hurt).
> "Mikhail" == Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mikhail> 2. -lc -- explicitly linking with libc is wrong, AFAIK, but
Mikhail> the configure-generated Makefiles do this. This was an issue
Mikhail> with earlier LyX versions as well.
Would the attached patch be OK? (the tex2lyx part i
On Monday 02 July 2007 04:48:59 Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I maintain the port of LyX on FreeBSD and was checking, how the new version
> is built, so I can update the port quicker, when you make the final release
> of 1.5.0 (it is currently at 1.4.4).
>
> Here are the problems I had to wor
