Re: install --version-suffix bugs

2002-03-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> | Lars> | Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: install --version-suffix bugs

2002-03-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Lars> | Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> Think | Lars> binary rpms. Think 'make

Re: install --version-suffix bugs

2002-03-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Think | Lars> binary rpms. Think 'make bindist'. > | Lars> btw. I think we generate bindist wrong. Is really working as it

Re: install --version-suffix bugs

2002-03-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Think Lars> binary rpms. Think 'make bindist'. Lars> btw. I think we generate bindist wrong. Is really working as it Lars> is now? I think I checked it still worked after the

Re: install --version-suffix bugs

2002-03-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Think binary rpms. Think 'make bindist'. btw. I think we generate bindist wrong. Is really working as it is now? -- Lgb

Re: install --version-suffix bugs

2002-03-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Wednesday 06 March 2002 2:34 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Angus> However, the real nastiness is if I run the installed version Angus> through a symbolic link /

Re: install --version-suffix bugs

2002-03-06 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 2:34 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> However, the real nastiness is if I run the installed version > Angus> through a symbolic link /usr/local/bin/lyx -> > Angus> /usr/local/bin/lyx-1.2.0cvs > > In

Re: install --version-suffix bugs

2002-03-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> However, the real nastiness is if I run the installed version Angus> through a symbolic link /usr/local/bin/lyx -> Angus> /usr/local/bin/lyx-1.2.0cvs Indeed, if the binary is named /usr/local/bin/lyx, it will look for a similarly

Re: install --version-suffix bugs

2002-03-06 Thread Angus Leeming
I've done a bit more scouting. It seems to me that installed_system_lyxdir should be set in the configuration and stored in version.C which at least believes that the installed_system_lyxdir is in the right place. Angus aleem@pneumon:src-> grep -n system_lyxdir *.C BufferView_pimpl.C:1471:

Re: install --version-suffix bugs

2002-03-06 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 1:21 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> When running an uninstalled version of lyx (current cvs), I get > Angus> the following console messages LyX: Unknown LyX function > Angus> `open-stuff' [around l

Re: install --version-suffix bugs

2002-03-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> When running an uninstalled version of lyx (current cvs), I get Angus> the following console messages LyX: Unknown LyX function Angus> `open-stuff' [around line 40 of file Angus> /usr/local/share/lyx/bind/emacs.bind] LyX: Unknown L