On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:25:51AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Pimpls do not come for free, either. In the case of LyX, the cost for
> running times are certainly negligible, but then we have to ask ourself
> also what benefit ES will give us.
Pimpls make code navigation a real pain ...
john
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Pimpls do not come for free, either. In the case of LyX, the cost for
| running times are certainly negligible, but then we have to ask ourself
| also what benefit ES will give us.
being able to use exceptions?
--
Lgb
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 01:02:44PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> It would seem you are referring to:
> http://www.gotw.ca/gotw/059.htm
> as the obscure theory behind these arguements.
>
> At least now I can see a reason instead of just drug induced ravings.
There is certainly something good in excep
It would seem you are referring to:
http://www.gotw.ca/gotw/059.htm
as the obscure theory behind these arguements.
At least now I can see a reason instead of just drug induced ravings.
Allan. (ARRae)
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 04 April 2002 2:52 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> ??
>>
>> I wonder what kind of drug I am on today...
>>
>> I obviously mean exception safe.
>
| Talking of such (rather than about your medication), I bought Exceptional C++
| the other d
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Every now and then somebody adds a member to the class but not to swap.
| No compiler warning possible. Been there, done that. Removed swap again
| in most cases. Called it a 'obscure theory'.
If you keep your class variables in a Pimpl, then it gets
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 02:06:43PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Talking of such (rather than about your medication), I bought
> Exceptional C++ the other day. I guess this is where you get your ideas
> on this front from.
>
> I also bought Scott Meyer's Effective STL. It's bloody good!
It's fa
On Thursday 04 April 2002 2:52 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> ??
>
> I wonder what kind of drug I am on today...
>
> I obviously mean exception safe.
Talking of such (rather than about your medication), I bought Exceptional C++
the other day. I guess this is where you get your ideas on this fr
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:48:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | [Which is always a pain in the ass to maintain if you have a dozen members
> | or so...]
>
> ... and if there are a lot of class variables then something is wrong
> with the design... (I think I even heard you say that)
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:32:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> Yes, you need to implement a non-throwing swap function, but then you
>>> are typesafe.
>>
| | [Typesafe?]
??
| Yes typesafe?
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:32:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Yes, you need to implement a non-throwing swap function, but then you
>> are typesafe.
>
| [Typesafe?]
Yes typesafe?
| [Which is always a pain in the ass to maintain if you have a
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:32:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Yes, you need to implement a non-throwing swap function, but then you
> are typesafe.
[Typesafe?]
[Which is always a pain in the ass to maintain if you have a dozen members
or so...]
What the heck is wrong with the auto-gene
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thursday 04 April 2002 1:59 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> What is
>>
>> void InsetGraphicsParams::copy(InsetGraphicsParams const & igp)
>>
>> good for? The auto-generated copy constructor would be fine, wouldn't it?
I think init should be removed as
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| What is
>
| void InsetGraphicsParams::copy(InsetGraphicsParams const & igp)
>
| good for? The auto-generated copy constructor would be fine, wouldn't it?
>
This should change as well:
InsetGraphicsParams &
InsetGraphicsParams::operator=(InsetGraphics
On Thursday 04 April 2002 1:59 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> What is
>
> void InsetGraphicsParams::copy(InsetGraphicsParams const & igp)
>
> good for? The auto-generated copy constructor would be fine, wouldn't it?
>
> Andre'
Looks like you're right...
Angus
15 matches
Mail list logo
